Pemberian Sanksi bagi Anak Korban Perkosaan Incest yang Melakukan Aborsi (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor : 5/Pid.Sus-Anak/2018/PN.MBN)

Dinda Tania Wardani, Anajeng Esri Edhil Mahanani

Abstract


Kids are the following technology of the country whose rights have to be included, the state has provided a legal umbrella as stipulated in regulation wide variety 23 of 2002 regarding child safety, and regulation wide variety 11 of 2012 regarding the kid crook Justice device. In the current era, there are many problems in Indonesia related to children as victims of sexual crimes where children must be protected, especially as victims and have not been able to account for the law. One of which is in the districtl court docket range : l5/Pid.Sus-child/2018/PN.MBNl the case of the crime of abortion. A 15 year old child is sentenced to commit an abortion against a child in the womb, a child has an abortion due to an 18 year old sibling. The punishment given by the judge to a child victim of rape is contrary to Article forty eight of the crook Code. Where a children sufferer of rape is requested to be held criminally accountable. consequently, this have a look at will speak a way to modify abortion from rape in step with fine regulation in Indonesia, the way to shield kids who are abortionists on account of incestuous rape.

The approach used on this examine is a normative juridical approach. This research data was obtained through primary data, namely the decision of the district court number: 5/Pid.Sus-Child/2018/PN.MBN. This research aims to present a situation or formulate a problem according to the available data. Therefore it is clear that this study (Study Number: 5/Pid.Sus-Anak/2018/PN.MBN) uses normative legal procedures with the aim of obtaining a clear picture regarding the judicial review of criminal convictions against minors who are victims of criminal acts incestuous rape who underwent an abortion.

Thel effects of thisl take a look at imply that the selection wide variety : 5/Pid.Sus-child/2018/PN.MBN is still contradictory, a child who is still 15 years old is sentenced to commit the crime of abortion against a child in the womb. The child had an abortion because of his older brother. The punishment given by the judge to a child victim of rape is contrary to Article forty eight of the crook Code. In which a child sufferer of rape is asked to be held criminally responsible

Keywords


Abortion, Child, Incest Rape Victim

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abintoro, Prakoso. Hukum Perlindungan Anak. Jakarta: Laksbang Pressindo, 2016.

Achmad, Mukti Fajar and Yulianto. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2010.

Aji, Utami Kirana Tanti and Mulyana. “Tanggung Jawab Dokter Dalam Melakukan Aborsi Tanpa Seijin Ibu Yang Mengandung Atau Keluarga Dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Mimbar Justisia 2, no. 3 (2015): 12–18.

Gosita, Arif. Masalah Perlindungan Anak. Jakarta: Bhuana Ilmu Populer, 2004.

Harefa, Beniharmoni. “Diversi Sebagai Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Asasi Anak Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum 1, no. 1 (2015): 13.

Juju, Samsudin. Perlindungan Anak Terhadap Tindak Perkosaan. Jakarta: Deepublish, 2014.

Krisnani, Amanda and Hetty. “Analisis Kasus Anak Perempuan Korban Pemerkosaan Inses.” Focus: Jurnal Pekerjaan Sosial 2, no. 1 (2019): 120–36.

Kristiani, Made Dwi. “Kejahatan Kekerasan Seksual (Perkosaan) Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Kriminologi.” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana 3, no. 3 (2014): 44–124.

Mahmud, Mustakim. “Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Anak Menurut Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law 1, no. 2 (2019): 128–38.

Romli, Dewani. “Aborsi Dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Islam (Suatu Kajian Komparatif).” Al-’Adalah 10, no. 2 (2011): 157–64.

Rumelda Silalahi and Rasmita Luciana. “Pandangan Hukum Kesehatan Terhadap Abortus Provocatus Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2009.” Jurnal Darma AgungJurnal Darma Agung 27, no. 3 (2019): 82–98.

Saraswati, Rika. Hukum Perlindungan Anak Di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2015.

Susanti, Yuli. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Aborsi (Abortus Provocatus) Korban Perkosaan.” Syiar Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 14, no. 2 (2012): 79–93.

Tursilarini, Yoga Tateki. “Dampak Kekerasan Seksual Di Ranah Domestik Terhadap Keberlangsungan Hidup Anak.” Jurnal Hukum 2, no. 3 (2017): 12–18.

Waluyadi. Ilmu Kedokteran Kehakiman Dalam Perspektif Waluyadi, Peradilan Dan Aspek Hukum Praktik Kedokteran. Jakarta: Djambatan, 2007.

Yanti, Evi. “Kajian Yuridis Legalisasi Aborsi Bagi Korban Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan Dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif.” Jurnal Lex Renaissance 5, no. 4 (2020): 836.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.51825/yta.v3i1.16706

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Yustisia Tirtayasa: Jurnal Tugas Akhir

EDITORIAL ADDRESS
Faculty of Law, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Jl. Tirtayasa, Sindangsari, Kec. Pabuaran, Serang, Provinsi Banten       
Telp. (0254) 280330 Ext. 218, Fax.: (0254) 281254
Website: https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/nhk
E-mail  : [email protected] 

 

OPEN ACCESS POLICY

Yustisia Tirtayasa is an open access journal, so articles are freely available to the readers.

 


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.