The Effect of Individual and Cooperative Learning on Students’ Writing Ability

Ishak Ishak, Euis Yanah Mulyanah

Abstract


The objectives of the research are to improve students’ writing ability and to enrich the effective approach for the students in improving their writing ability. This is an experimental study conducted at Muhammadiyah University of Tangerang.  The data were collected from 46 students as sample from 3rd semester at Muhammadiyah University of Tangerang and they were divided into two classes, one class as the experiment group and the other one as the control group. The researcher used quasi experimental research design to get the data and the data are gathered through pretest and posttest of writing by using writing essay as the instrument of the research. Based on the result of t-test shows that tobserved (1.93) > (1.72) ttable. So, Ho was rejected and Ha was accepted. Mean that, teaching writing by using cooperative learning technique was more effective than teaching writing using individual learning.  In teaching writing, it is advisable for lecturers to learn the approach of cooperative and individual learning, but the lecturer should facilitate cooperative learning because it makes the students more motivated in the learning process.

 

Keywords: Individual, Cooperative Learning, Writing Ability


Full Text:

PDF

References


Amanto, Richard & A. Patricia. 2003. Making it happen (from interactive to participatory language teaching (theory and practice). 3rd edition. New York: Longman

Brown, H. Douglas. 2007. Teaching by principle (an interactive approach to language pedagogy). 3rd edition. San Francisco: Pearson Longman

Conttia, Lai Man Wai. 2002. The Influence of Learner Motivation on Developing Autonomous Learning in an English-for-Specific-Purposes Course. http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/thesis_lai_conttia.pdf

Elliot, Stephen N. 2000. Educational Psychology: effective teaching, effective learning. Boston: Mc Graw Hill

Harmer, Jeremy. 2007. How to teach English. 1st edition. Oxford: Pearson Longman

Hyland, K. 2002. Genre approach.

J, Grabowski. 1996. Writing and Speaking. Common grounds and differences toward a regulation theory of written language production. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

J.R, Hayes. 1996. A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C.M. Levy and S. Randell (eds), The science of writing. NJL Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

L, Hamp-Lyons and S.P, Mattias. .1997. TOEFL 2000-writing: Composition, community, and assessment. (TOEFL Monograph Series Report No.5). Priceton, NJ: Educational Testing Service

Liang, Tsailing. 2002. Implementing cooperative learning in EFL teaching: process and effects. http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/thesis_liang_tsailing.pdf ,2002

Norman, Dion G. 2006. Using STAD in an EFL elementary school classroom in South Korea: effects on student achievement, motivation, and attitudes toward cooperative learning. http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/Norman_thesis_2006.pdf ,2006

Sakai, Noboru. 2002. The Theoretical Study of Motivational Transfer and Entertainment Use in Self-study CALL. http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/Thesis_Sakai.pdf

Weigle Crushing Sara. 2002. Assessing Writing. Cambridge University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/jels.v2i1.1593

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
Journal of English Language Studies is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright @ 2021 Journal of English Language Studies.

View My Stats