.png)
.png)
Aligning Alternative Assessment with Curriculum Design and Teaching Practices: The Case of Communicative English Skills Course at Three Ethiopian Universities
Abstract
The current study set out to investigate the alignment of alternative assessment (AA) with the communicative English skills course (CESC) curriculum design and the CESC teaching practices at three Ethiopian universities. Employing a mixed-methods design, it was guided by three research questions. The study utilised summative content data and quantitative content data, and subjected them to descriptive statistics, and Mann-Whitney U Test and Kruskal-Wallis Test. Some of its main results are worth mentioning. Firstly, out of a total of 632 assessment items in CESC, only 30.22% of them were found to be communicatively using AA, while 69.78% of the items in the module were found to be using traditional assessment (TA). Secondly, the instructors’ assessment practices in CESC were inconsistent with AA, and varied across the three universities and from instructor to instructor. The assessment items were disproportionate to the language objectives in CESC because the instructors mainly devoted more time to assessing reading skills, grammar, and vocabulary knowledge. For example, the correlation coefficients of the assessment items for grammar (0.142), vocabulary (0.139), and reading (0.115) were better aligned with the content items in the CESC module than the assessment items for speaking (0.106), listening (0.017), and writing (0.060). Thirdly, based on the correlation coefficients of the study, the overall alignment between the instructors’ AA items and the communicativeness of the items in CESC (0.1291) was generally very low at the three universities during the study period. To this end, CESC should be designed in such a way as to incorporate complex authentic and challenging learning activities. Fourthly and finally, the alignment between the dimensions of CESC in the Ethiopian higher education context is a new area of engagement. Therefore, there is room for further studies to investigate this issue without which the teaching and the assessment of CESC are likely to be compromised.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al-Mamari, H. M., Al-Mekhlafi, M. A. & Al-Barwani, A. Th. (2018). Is communicative language teaching being tested communicatively? An analysis of English tests in Oman. English Language Teaching, 11(11), 83-91.
Ansarey, D. (2012). Communicative language teaching in EFL contexts: Teachers’ attitude and perception in Bangladesh. ASA University Review, 6(1), 61-77.
Benzehaf, B. (2017). Exploring teachers’ assessment practices and skills. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 4 (1), 1-18.
Brown, J. D. (2010). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practice. New York: Longman.
Brown, J. D. (2012). Choosing the right type of assessment, In C. Coombe, S. J. Stoynoff, P. Davidson, & B. O. Sullivan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to language assessment (pp. 133-139). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Christiana, A. O. (2019). An evaluation of the communicative approach to language question and language education. International Journal of Education, Learning and development, 7(6),1-9.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative, and mixed research approaches. London: Sage.
Dagne, T. (2009). The exploration of the practices of continuous assessment by EFL teachers: The case of Jimma Teachers’ College. Unpublished MA thesis. http://etd.aau.edu.et/handle/123456789/7604
Dames, G.E. (2012). Enhancing teaching and learning through constructive alignment. Acta Theological, 2, 35-53.
Davies, A. (2013). Fifty years of language assessment. The Companion to Language Assessment, 11(1), 1-18.
Demir, S. B., & Pismek, N. (2018). A convergent parallel mixed methods study of controversial issues in social study classrooms. Educational Science, Theory and Practice, 18(1), 119-149.
Devi, K. S. (2019). Constructivist approach to learning based on the concepts of Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky: An analytical overview. Journal of Indian Education, 41(4), 5-19.
Forutan, A. 2014. Traditional versus alternative writing assessment. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 2(7), 1-22.
Fraooq, U.M. (2015). Creating a communicative language teaching environment for improving students’ communicative competence at EFL/EAP university Level. International Education Studies, 8(4), 179-191.
Garuana, S. & Mcpherson, M. (2015). A constructive alignment approach for assessing essential cultural soft skills in tourism. Procardia: Social and Behavioural Science, 191, 6-11.
Geberew, M., T. (2014). EFL classroom assessment: teachers’ practice and teaching techniques adjustment in Ethiopia. Academic Journal of Education Research and Review, 9(20), 1071-1089.
Getachew, A., & Deribe, A. (2006). Language policy in Ethiopia: history and current trends. Ethiopian Journal of Education and Science, 2(1), 37-62.
Gibbons, J. D. (1967). Correlation coefficients between nonparametric tests for location and scale. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 19, 519–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02911701
Greene, C. J., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis Evaluation Designs, 11(3), 255-274.
Griffiths, T. H. (2016). Application of summative content analysis to a postal questionnaire. Nurse Researcher, 23(3), 30-36.
Hashemnezhad, H. (2015). Qualitative content analysis research: A review article. Journal of ELT and Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 54-62.
Herdiawan, R. D. (2018). Authentic assessment in EFL teaching and learning. Rama Dwika Hediawan, 9(1), 1-10.
Hsieh, H-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Iyer, S, (2015). Impacts of washback in English as second language classroom, an investigation, EFL teachers’ voice. International Journal for Teacher of English, 5(3), 81-88.
Kabouha, R., & Elias, T. (2015). Aligning teaching and assessment to course objectives: The case of preparatory year English program at King Abdulaziz University. International Journal of Applied and English Literature, 4(5), 83-91.
Kibbe, C. T. (2017). The history of communicative language teaching (CLT) and its use in the classroom. Unpublished, US Military Academic, West Point.
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
Liu, D. (2015). A Critical review of Krashen’s input hypothesis: Three major arguments. Journal of Education and Human Development, 4(4), 139-146.
Morrow, C. K. (2018). Communicative language testing. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp. 342–350). New Jersey: Wiley.
Ministry of Education (MOE). (1994). Ethiopian education and training policy, Transitional Government of Ethiopia. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Ministry of Education (MOE). (2017). Higher education inspective evaluation result feedback report presented to Ambo University. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Ministry of Education (MOE). (2018). Ethiopian education development roadmap (2018-30): An integrated executive summary, MOE Strategy Centre (ESC). Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Motuma, H. (2018). Content validity of EFL teacher-made assessment: The cause of communicative English skills course at Ambo University. East African Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(1), 41-62.
Motuma, H, & Chaka C. (forthcoming). Implementing alternative assessment in a communicative English skills course at three Ethiopian universities. MEXTESOL Journal.
Nasab, F.G. (2015). Alternative versus traditional assessment. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(6), 165-178.
Okeeffe, L. (2013). A framework for textbook analysis. International Journal Review of Contemporary Learning Research, 2(1), 1-13.
Palacio, M., Gviria, S. & Brown, J.D. (2016). Aligning English testing with curriculum. Profile issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 18(2), 63-77.
Reyes-Chua, E. (2013). Constructive alignment vs. experiential learning for ESL students. Arab World English Journal, 4(2), 235-255.
Sandorova, Z. (2014). Content analysis as a research method in investigating the cultural components in foreign language textbook. Journal of Language and Culture Education, 2(1), 95-126
Savage, I. R. (1957). Nonparametric statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 52(279), 331-344.
Shannon-Baker, P. (2016). Making paradigms meaningful in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(4), 319-334.
Sidek, H. M. (2012). EFL Textbook Analysis, Language and Literacy, 14(3) 01-27: The Islamic Science University of Malaysia
Smith, M. K. (2000). Curriculum theory and practice. The Encyclopedia of informal education, 3(4), 209-219.
Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 158-164.
Temesgen, T. (2017). Assessing the practices of one one-to-five cooperative language learning of grade nine students EFL speaking classes, EJLCC, 2(2), 1-21.
Trines, S. (2018). Education in Ethiopia. Education system Profiles. World Education News + Reviews. https://wenr.wes.org/2018/11/education-i
Ur, P. (2010). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wood, J. (2011). Communicative language teaching (CLT) and communication strategies (CSs): Theory and practice. Modern Language Journal, 83(4), 495-517.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/jels.v8i1.17924
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of English Language Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Journal of English Language Studies is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright @ 2024 Journal of English Language Studies.