Wieka Barathayomi, Dina Rachmawati, Ledy Nurlely, Rita Handayani


The objective of this research is to design an English for specific purposes syllabus for Editing Course. This research used Research and Development method. This research consists of two main activities: 1) need analysis and 2) designing an English for specific purposes syllabus for editing course. The data for this research were collected through an open-ended questionnaire consisting of 7 items, and study of literature. The open-ended questionnaire was used to collect data about students’ understanding of Editing. The study of literature was used as supporting theories to design and develop Syllabus for Editing Course. The study showed that the syllabus of Editing Course need to be designed based on prerequisite knowledge and skills of an Editor, such as knowledge and skills in mechanical, content, and language editing.


Keywords: Syllabus Design, Need Analysis, ESP, and Editing

Full Text:



Butcher, Judith, et al. 2006. The Cambridge Handbook for Editors, Copyeditors and Proofreaders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dickinson, L. 1991. Self-Instruction in language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dudley – Evans, T. 1997. Developments In English for Specific Purposes: A multidisciplinary Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dudley-Evans, T. & St John, M. 1998. Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A Multi-disciplinary Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Einshohn, Amy. 2000. The Copyeditor’s Handbook: A Guide for Book Publishing and Corporate Communication. California: University of California Press.

Friend, Cecilia and Don Challenger. 2013. Contemporary Editing. New York: Routledge.

Graves, K. 1996. Teachers as Course Developers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hutchinson and Waters. 1987. English for specific purposes. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kennedy, C. & Bolitho, R. 1984. English for Specific Purposes. London: Macmillan.

McDonough, J. 1984. ESP in perspective: A practical guide. London and Glasgow: Collins Educational.

Miles, Huberman, & Saldana, 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis. New York, NY. Cambridge University Press.

Mountford, A.J. 1978. English for Specific Purposes. London: Longman.

Munby, J. 1978. Communicative Syllabus Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C. 2002. Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. New York, NY. Cambridge University Press.

Rita, C. R. & Klein, D. J. 2007. Design and Development Research. London. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Richterich, R. 1972. A Model for the Definition of Language Needs of Adults Learning a Modern Language. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

Richterich, R., & Chancerel, J.L. 1980. Identifying the needs of adults learning a foreign.

Robinson, P. 1991. ESP today: A practitioner’s guide. New York: Prentice Hall.

Strevens, P. 1988. ESP after twenty years: A re-appraisal. In M. Tickoo (Ed.), ESP: State of the art. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.

Wright, C. 1992. The Benefits of ESP. Cambridge Language Consultants.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
Journal of English Language Studies is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright @ 2022 Journal of English Language Studies.

View My Stats