Finding Learning Strategy in Improving Science Literacy

Yanti Herlanti, Yuke Mardiati, Rahmawati Rahmawati, Annisaa Meyrizka Kusumo Putri, Nurlaelah Jamil, Miftahuzzakiyah Miftahuzzakiyah, Ahmad Sofyan, Zulfiani Zulfiani, Sugiarti Sugiarti


The result of science literacy in Indonesian students has been satisfactorily yet. The government has introduced some new learning strategies. The research is aimed to finding some learning strategies can improved literacy science.  The research was conducted in Indonesian school involving 213 participants who are divided into study groups using several learning strategies. Research involved all student on 10 th grade in that school. Improvement of science literacy was analyzed by N-gain and  comparing some strategies of learning was analyzed by Anova followed Turkey. The results shows the impovement of science literacy in the learning by using scientific approach was not as good as inquiry approach, Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI), and Science Technology Education Matematics (STEM).  The results of science literacy finding the improvement in science literacy of students who learn by using scientific approach comparing using scientific approach is similar to the one using Science Technology Scociety (STS) strategy.


Inquiry; Science Literacy; ADI; STS; STEM

Full Text:



Brickman, P, Gormally, C, Amstrong, N & Hallar, B 2009, ‘Effects of Inquiry-based Learning on Students’s Science Literacy Skills and Confidence’, International Journal for The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1-22.

Bybee, RW 2013, The Case for STEM education Challenges and Opportunities, NSTA Press, Virginia.

Dawson, V. & Venville, G.J 2009, ‘High School Student’s Informal Reasoning and Argumentation about Biotechnology: An Indicator of Science Literacy?’, International Journal of Science Education, vol. 31, no. 11, pp.1412-45.

DeBoer, GE 1991, A history of Ideas in Science Education, Teacher College Press, New York.

DeBoer, GE 2000, ‘Scientific Literacy: Another Look at Its Historical and Contemporary Meanings and Its Relationship to Science Education Reform’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 582-601.

Greenleaf, CL, Litman, C, Hanson, TL, Rosen, R, Boscardin, CK, Herman, J, Schneider, SA, Madden, S & Jones, B 2011, ‘Intergating Literacy and Science in Biology: Teaching and Learning Impacts of Reading Apprenticeship Professsional Development’, American Educational Research Journal, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 647-717.

Hake, RR 1999, Analyzing Change/Gain Scores, Viewed 15 October 2018,

Jagger, SL & Yore, LD 2012, ‘Mind the Gap: Looking for Evidence-Based Practice of Science Literacy for All in Science Teaching Journals’, Journal of Science Teacher Education, vol. 23, pp. 559-77.

Indonesia Ministry of National Education 2016, Peringkat dan Capaian PISA Indonesia Mengalami Peningkatan, viewed 20 May 2019,

Khaeroningtyas, N, Permanasari, A & Hamidah, I. 2016, ‘STEM Learning in Material of Temperature and Its Change to Improve Scientific Literacy of Junior High School Students’, Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, vo. 5, no. 1, pp. 94-100.

Laugksch, RC 2000, ‘Scientific Literacy: A Conceptual overview’, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Sci. Ed, vol. 84, pp. 71–94.

Marrero, M.E. & Mensah, F.M.M 2010, Socioscientific Decision Making the Ocean: The Case Study of 7th Grade Life Science Students. Electronic Journal of Science Education, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1-26

Meltzer, DE 2002 ‘The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible “hidden variable” in diagnostic pretest scores’, American Journal of Physics, vol. 70, no. 12, pp. 1259.

National Research Council 1996, National Science Education Standards, The National Academies Press, Washington DC.

National Research Council 2000, Inquiry and the National Science Education Standars: a guide for teaching and learning, National Academi Press, Washington DC.

Nbina, JB & Obamanu, BJ 2010, ‘The Meaning of Scientific Literacy: A model of relevance in science education’, Academic Leadership The Online Journal, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1-7.

National Research Council 2000, Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning, National Academies Press, Washington DC.

Nuangchalerm, P 2010, Engaging Students to Perceive Nature of Science Though Socioscientific Issue-Based Instruction, European Journal of Social Science, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 34-37.

Sampson, V, Enderle, P, Gleim, L, Grooms, J, Hester, M, Southerland, S & Wilson, K 2014, Argument Driven Inquiry in Biology, NSTA Press, Arlington Virginia.

Seddon, M 2017, ‘Strategies for integrating literacy into a science classroom’, viewed 20 May 2019,

Shen, BSP 1975, ‘Science Literacy: Public understanding of science is becoming vitally needed in developing and industrialize countries alike’ American Scientist, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 265-68.

Snow, CE & Dibner, KA 2016, Science Literacy: Concepts, Contexts, and Consequences, The National Academies Press. Washington DC.

Turiman, P, Omar, J, Daud, AM, & Osman, K 2012, ‘Fostering the 21st Century Skills through Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skills’, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 59, pp. 110-116.

OECD 2001, Knowledge and Skills for Life: First Result From The

OECD Programme for International Student Assessmentt (PISA) 2000, OECD Publishing. Paris.

OECD 2004, Learning for Tomorrow’s World: First Result from PISA 2003, OECD Publishing. Paris.

OECD 2007, PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow’s World Volume 1, OECD Publishing. Paris.

OECD 2010, PISA 2009 Results: What Students Know Can Do Volume I, OECD Publishing. Paris.

OECD 2014, PISA 2012 Result in Focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know, OECD Publishing. Paris.

OECD 2016, PISA 2015 Result in Focus, OECD Publishing. Paris.

OECD 2016, PISA 2015 Assesment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic, and Financial Literacy, OECD Publishing. Paris.

Osborne, J 2005, The Role of argument in Science Education. K. Boesma, M. Goedhart, O. De Jong, & H. Eijkelhof [Eds]. Research and Quality of Science Education. Dordrecht, Nederlands: Spinger.

Viera, RM & Viera, CT 2016, ‘Fostering Sciencetific Literacy and Critical Thinking in Elementary Science Education’, International Journal od Science and Math Education, vol. 14, pp. 659-680.

Yager, RE 1996, Science technology society as reform in science education, Suny Press



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Copyright © 2021 Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA. All rights reserved.