THE INFLUENCE OF SCIENTIFIC APPROACH AND CRITICAL THINKING TOWARDS STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL IN RECOUNT TEXT AT STATE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL OF SMAN 6 KABUPATEN TANGERANG
Abstract
The aims of this research are to investigate the of Scientific Approach and Critical Thinking Towards Students’ Writing Skill in Recount Text at State Senior High School of SMAN 6 Kabupaten Tangerang. This study is categorized as quasi experimental research in which to investigate the Influence of Scientific Approach and critical thinking habit toward students’ writing skill. The method used in this study is quantitative method with treatment by level 2x2 design. The researcher used test and questionnaire to collect the data. The findings of this study are: (1) There was the difference of writing skill between students who were taught by Scientific Appraoch strategy and those who were taught by Conventional strategy (2) There were interactional influence of teaching strategy (Scientific Approach and Conventional) and Critical thinking toward students’ writing skill (3) There was an influence of students’ Writing skill who were taught by Scientific Approiach strategy was higher than those who were taught by Conventional strategy for students who had high critical thinking (4) There was the difference of students’ writing skill who were taught by Scientific Approach strategy and those who were taught by Conventional strategy for students who had low critical thinking.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amiruddin, S. 2004. Learning English Using Recount Text. Padang: Diklat Guru Bahasa Inggris SeSumatera Barat.
Anderson, M. & Anderson, K. (2003). Text types in english 1. Victoria: MacMillan Education Australia.
Batstone, R. (1994). Grammar. New York: Oxford University Press.
Carter, R. & McCarthy, M. (2008). Cambridge grammar of english: a comprehensive guide to spoken and written grammar and usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coffey, M.P. (1987). Communication through writing. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.
Cottrell, S. (2005). Critical thinking skills. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Dewey, J. (1909). How we Think. Boston: DC. Health.
Emillia, E. (2008). Menulis Tesis dan Disertasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Ennis, R.H. (1989). Critical thinking: a streamlined conception. Journal of Teaching Philosophy. 14(1). 5-25.
Fisher, A. & Nosich. (1993). Critical thinking: an introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fisher, A. & Scriven, M. (1997). Critical thinking: its definition and assessment. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Journal of Critical Thinking Vol. 16, Issue 2, pp 247-251.
Glaser, E. M. (1991). An experiment in the development of critical thinking. New York: Bureau of Publications, Columbia University.
Harmer, Jeremy. 2002. The Practice of English Language Teaching. New York: Longman.
Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Hefferman, J. A. W & Lincoln, J. E. (1982). Writing a college hand book. New York: Norton.
Juniardi, Yudi. 2015. Research On Language Teaching: From Theory To Practice. Serang: Untirta Press.
Juniardi, Yudi and Irmawanty, 2012. Students' Critical Thinking And Their Reading Comprehension Ability: Proceeding The Ninth International Conference on English Studies: 37-40
Johnson, B. I. (2009). Contextual teaching learning. California: Corwin Press Inc.
Kaur,Manjet Mehar Singh International Graduate Students’ Academic Writing Practicesin Malaysia: Challenges and Solutions. Journal of International Students Volume 5, Issue 1 (2015), pp. 12-22
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/aiselt.v2i2.10928
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
PROCEEDING AISELT (Annual International Seminar on English Language Teaching) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyright @ Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa [Untirta]. All rights reserved.