THE EFFECTS OF COGNITIVE AND FOCUS ON FORM INSTRUCTION TOWARD EFL LEARNERS’ ACHIEVEMENT OF GRAMMAR IN VOCATIONAL SCHOOL AT SMKN 3 KOTA SERANG
Abstract
The objective of this research is to find out the effect of cognitive and focus on form instruction toward vocational high school EFL learners’ achievement of grammar in vocational school at SMKN 3 Kota Serang. The researcher used quantitative research implementing the true experimental design as research method. There were two groups used in this research, the mainly; the experimental and control group. Sample of this research is students of SMKN 3 Kota Serang, 39 students selected for experimental group, and 38 students selected for control group. The research found that there is significant influence of cognitive and focus on form instruction toward vocational high school EFL learners’ achievement of grammar, it was indicated by the value of t-test higher than the value of t-table (0.950 > 0.000) at the level of significant of α 0.05 and the degree of freedom of 75. It means that the hypothesis was accepted. From those findings, it can be concluded that the use of cognitive and focus on form instruction is effective to influence learners’ achievement of grammar in vocational school at SMKN 3 Kota Serang. All these suggest that the use of cognitive and focus on form instruction in the class of English is highly encouraged.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aliaga, M. & Gunderson, B. (2002). Interactive Statisticss. New Jersey: Prentice Hall
Burns. (1972). Teaching English to Children. From Practice to Principle. Collins ELT: Prentice Hall.
Creswell, J.W. (2008). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Los Angeles: Sage
Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (Eds.). (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, R. (2001). Introduction: Investigating Form-Focused Instruction. Language Learning, 51, 1-46
Hornby (1995). Vocabulary Learning For Young Learners. National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Macquarie University.
Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lord, C. (2002). Are Subordinate Clauses More Difficult? In J. Bybee & M. Noonan (Eds.). Complex Sentences in Grammar and Discourse, (pp. 224-233)
Mindt, D. (1996). English Corpus Linguistics and the Foreign Language Teaching Syllabus. In Thomas, J. and Short, M. (Eds). Using Corpora for language Research (pp. 232-247). Harlow: Longman
Nation, I. S. P. (2001).Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Neuman, S. B., & Dwyer, J. (2009). Missing in action: Vocabulary instruction in pre-k. The Reading Teacher, 62(5), 384-392.
Rohmawati, C. (2016). Teaching Application Letter through Email for the 12th Grade Students of SMKN 3 Kota Serang Academic Year 2016/2017, pp. 101-109
Syafrizal & Rohmawati, C. (2017). Teaching Speaking Strategies at Vocational High School. The Journal of English Language Studies, Vol. 02, No. 01, March 2017, (66-83)
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/aiselt.v2i2.10932
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
PROCEEDING AISELT (Annual International Seminar on English Language Teaching) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyright @ Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa [Untirta]. All rights reserved.