TEACHING ENGLISH SPEAKING SKILL AT ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS’ AL–MUBAROK BOARDING SCHOOL SERANG (ETHNOGRAPHY RESEARCH)

Firna Octavia, Nurhaeda Gailea, Siti Hikmah

Abstract


This research aims to understand comprehensively about the process of teaching learning English in Islamic boarding school of Al-Mubarok – Serang - Banten, especially speaking skill. The method used in this study is qualitative research with ethnography design. The data were collected through observation, interview, field notes, and document analysis. The data were analyzed based on Spradley’s terms: domain taxonomic, component analysis, and discovering cultural theme. The results of the study show that (1) analyzing the needs and the environmental context in the formulation of learning objectives, (2) using 2 curriculums, they are the curriculum of 2013 for general subjects and special curriculum, (3) practice and using Muhadasah treatment in daily extracuriculer, (4) affecting factors in speaking learning, such as supporting factors, a) the obligation of english language in classroom and in boarding, b) there is speaking english program twicw a week, and obstacle factors such as lack of allocation of time and lack of english teacher. (5) english teachers also active and support in every english programme. The conclusion of the teaching learning process in Al-Mubarok boarding school especially speaking skill is appropriate with the national curriculum and special religion curriculum.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen, W. Stannard. 1954. Living English Speech. Hong Kong: Dai Nippon Printing Co.

Alexander, L. G. 1975. Developing Skills: An Integrated Course for Intermediate Students. Yogyakarta: Longman & Kanisius.

Angrosino, M. (2007). Doing ethnographic and observational research. Thousand. Oaks, CA: Sage

Bahadorfar, M. & Omidvar, R. (2015). Technology in teaching speaking skill. Acme International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(4), 913.

Brown, Gillian, and George Yule. Discourse Analysis. 2nd ed. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1994.

Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by principles: an Interactive ap- proach to language pedagogy (3rd ed.). New York: Pearson Education Inc.

Brown, H. D. & Abeywickrama, P. (2010). Language assessment: principles and classroom prac- tice (2nd ed.). New York: Pearson Education Inc.

Butler, Y. G. (2012). What Level of English Proficiency Do Elementary School Teachers Need to Attain to Teach EFL? Case Studies from Korea, Taiwan, and Japan. TESOL Quarterly, 38(2), 245-278.

Candlin, C. N., and Mercer, N. (2001). English Language Teaching In Its Social Context: a reader. London: Routledge.

Creswell, J. 2002. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. London: Sage.

Departemen agama RI. 2005. Pembakuan Sarana Pendidikan. Jakarta: Directorat jenderal kelembagaan agama islam DEPAG RI.

Drew C.J., Qualitative Research in Education (USA:Sage,2010), 22-23.

Efrizal, D. (2012). Improving students’ speaking through communicative language teaching method at Mts Ja-alhaq, Sentot Ali Basa islamic boarding school of Bengkulu, Indonesia. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(20), 127-134

Fathman, A. K., Quinn, M. E., & Kessler, C. (1992). Teaching science to English learners, grades 4–8 (NCBE Program Information Guide Series No. 11). Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.

Finocchiaro, Mary. 1958. Teaching English as a Second Language. USA: Harper & Row Publisher.

Fulcher, G. (2003). Testing second language speaking. London: Longman/Pearson Education.

G. Ramesh Babu, Research Methodology in Social Sciences (India:Concept Publishing Company, 2008),11

Harmer, Jeremy. The Practice of Language Teaching. 3rd ed. UK: Longman Publishers, 1998.

Hughes, Rebecca. 2006. Spoken English, TESOL, and applied Linguistics: Challenges for Theory and Practice. Great Britain: CPI Antony Rowe

Irawati, I. (2014). Improving students’ speaking ability through communicative language games. Magistra, No. 87 Th. XXV, 25-36.

Khorashadyzadeh, A. (2014). Why to use short stories in speaking classes? International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching in the Islamic World, 2(1), 9-15

Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching and learning. USA:Heinle.

Nemati, M., and Taghizadeh, M. (2013). Exploring Similarities and Differences between L1 and L2. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 4(9), 2477-2483

Neuman, W. L. (2003). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (5th ed.) Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Richard, Jack C and Rodger, Theodore S. 1999. Approaches and Method in Language Teaching: CommunicativeLanguage Teaching. Cambridge University Press

Roper, J. M., & Shapira, J. (2000). Ethnography in nursing research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

S. Aungwatanakun, English Teaching Methodology, (2nd). Bangkok:Chulalongkorn University Pres, 1994

Singleton, R. A & Straits, B. C (2005). Approaches to social research 4thed). new York: Oxford University Press.

Siti Hikmah, “Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris di Sekolah Unggulan SMAN CAHAYA MADANI BANTEN Boarding School di Provinsi Banten (Penelitian Etnografi di kelas XI SMAN CMBBS)” (Disertasi Doktor Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta, 2014) .

Spradley, J. P. (1979) The Ethnographic Interview. NewYork: Holt Rinehart and Winston .Spradley,J.P.,(1980) Participant Observation. NewYork: Holt. Rinehartand Winston.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/aiselt.v2i2.10947

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
PROCEEDING AISELT (Annual International Seminar on English Language Teaching) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyright @2024 Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa [Untirta]. All rights reserved.