Investigating urban and rural students’ practice and challenges in distance learning

Yulinda Septianing Putri, Endang Setyaningsih, Kristian Adi Putra

Abstract


The sudden shift from face-to-face learning to distance one gives rise to several different perceptions. Thus, this paper aims to investigate the perception of EFL students in experiencing distance learning. The participants are EFL students from rural schools and urban schools in Indonesia. The study scrutinizes how the participant experiences learning activities as well as encounters the challenges in distance education. To analyse the data, open-ended interview question was distributed online by using WhatsApp and Google-form platform. The result reveals that the implementation of distance learning has both positive and negative impact, however most of them agree that distance education implementation is more challenging, specifically dealing with the use of technology as they need to maximize many online applications provided on the internet. They acknowledge that technology is a good instrument with many purposes, and that it is a useful and most relevant platform which can be utilized in distance education. Additionally, the students tried many ways to minimize challenges or obstacles in their online learning. Furthermore, the result of this study will be useful for the teacher to maximize teaching and learning process as it provides challenges and obstacles encountered by the students in engaging with distance education implementation.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arif, M., Ameen, K., & Rafiq, M. (2017). Assessing distance education students’ satisfaction with web-based services. Online Information Review, 41(2), 202–218. doi:10.1108/oir-07-2016-0172 Bojović, Ž., Bojović, P. D., Vujošević, D., & Šuh, J. (2020). Education in times of crisis: Rapid transition to distance learning. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(6), 1467–1489. doi:10.1002/cae.22318. Bornschlegl, M., & Cashman, D. (2018). Considering the role of the distance student experience in student satisfaction and retention. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 1–17. doi:10.1080/02680513.2018.1509695

Bornschlegl, M., & Cashman, D. (2018). Considering the role of the distance student experience in student satisfaction and retention. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning. DOI: 10.1080/02680513.2018.1509695.

Cakir, Ozlem. (2014). The factors that affect online learners’ satisfaction. The Anthropologist, 17(3), 895-902. DOI: 10.1080/09720073.2014.11891504. Fidalgo, P., Thormann, J., Kulyk, O., & Lencastre, J. A. (2020). Students’ perceptions on distance education: A multinational study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1). doi:10.1186/s41239-020-00194-2. Gravani, M. N. (2014). Adult learning in a distance education context: theoretical and methodological challenges. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 34(2), 172–193. doi:10.1080/02601370.2014.982728

Ismaili, Y. (2021). Evaluation of students’ attitude toward distance learning during the pandemic (Covid-19): A case study of ELTE university. On the Horizon, 29(1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-09-2020-0032 Lamy, M-N. (2013). ‘Distance CALL Online’. In M. Thomas, H. Reinders & M. Warschauer (Eds.), Contemporary Computer-Assisted Language Learning. London & New York: Continuum. Pp 141-158. Lansing, J. (2017). A new model of college choice for distance learners. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 45(3), 365–389. doi:10.1177/0047239516673183.

. Yulinda, Endang & Kristian / PROCEEDING AISELT (Annual International Seminar on English Language

Teaching), 6(1) (2021) 224–233

Li, G., Sun, Z., & Jee, Y. (2019). The more technology the better? A comparison of teacher-student interaction in high and low technology uses elementary EFL classrooms in China. System, 84, 24–40. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2019.05.003.

Motteram, G. (2018). Distance teacher preparation. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1–7. doi:10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0404. Nikou, S., & Maslov, I. (2021). An analysis of students' perspectives on e-learning participation – the case of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 38(3), 299-315. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-12-2020-0220. Power, M. (2007). From distance education to e-learning: A multiple case study on instructional design problems. E-Learning and Digital Media, 4(1), 64–78. doi:10.2304/elea.2007.4.1.64. Refae, G. A. E., Kaba, A., Eletter, S. (2020). Distance learning during COVID-19 pandemic: Satisfaction, opportunities and challenges as perceived by faculty members and students. Interactive technology and Smart Education. Doi: 10.1108/ITSE-08-2020-0128. Rizvi, Y. S., & Nabi, A. (2021). Transformation of learning from real to virtual: An exploratory-descriptive analysis of issues and challenges. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 14(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2020-0052. Ryan, Y., & Latchem, C. (2016). Educational technologies in distance education. The Wiley Handbook of Learning Technology, 160–179. doi:10.1002/9781118736494.ch10.

White, C. (2012). Distance language learning. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. doi:10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0338. White, C. J. (2017). Distance language teaching with technology. The Handbook of Technology and Second Language Teaching and Learning, 134–148. doi:10.1002/9781118914069.ch10.

Zhang, P. (2014). A case study on technology use in distance learning. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30(4), 398-419. DOI: 10.1080/08886504.1998.10782235.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/aiselt.v6i1.12512

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
PROCEEDING AISELT (Annual International Seminar on English Language Teaching) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyright @2024 Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa [Untirta]. All rights reserved.