Kebijakan Editorial

Fokus dan Ruang Lingkup

UNIK Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Luar Biasa memuat hasil penelitian yang berkaitan dengan pembelajaran dan temuan baru dalam bidang Pendidikan Luar Biasa.

 

Kebijakan Bagian

Articles

Centang Naskah Terbuka Centang Diindeks Centang Telah di-Peer review
 

Proses Peer Review

Artikel yang dikirim pada awalnya akan ditinjau oleh reviewer. Proses peninjauan akan dilakukan minimal oleh 2 reviewer melalui proses peer-review double-blind. Penerimaan artikel yang dikirimkan mempertimbangkan saran dan rekomendasi reviewer. Artikel ini akan diterbitkan setelah mendapatkan persetujuan Dewan Editorial.

 

Frekuensi Penerbitan

Jurnal ini terbit setiap 2 kali pertahun yaitu bulan januari dan bulan juli.

 

Pengarsipan

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration.

 

Sejarah Jurnal UNIK

Jurnal ini dibuat atas dasar kebutuhan akan informasi Pendidikan Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus terutama dilingkungan Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa dan Provinsi Banten pada umunya. Perkembangan penelitian dalam bidang Pendidikan Luar Biasa yang dilakukan para dosen, mahasiswa, guru, praktisi dan stakeholder lainnya membutuhkan media untuk mempublikasikan hasil-hasil penelitian tersebut. Melalui publikasi ilmiah, hasil-hasil penelitian dapat dikomunikasikan kepada masyarakat dan dapat diambil maanfaatnya bagi seluruh masyarakat. Berdasarkan pertimbangan tersebut, maka Jurusan Pendidikan Luar Biasa FKIP UNTIRTA membuat jurnal ilmiah dengan nama UNIK Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Luar Biasa.

 

Deskripsi Jurnal UNIK

Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Luar Biasa UNIK merupakan jurnal ilmiah berkala yang mempublikasikan hasil penelitian dalam bidang Pendidikan Luar Biasa terutama dalam pembelajaran terhadap Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus dan temuan-temuan baru mengenai bidang Pendidikan Luar Biasa.

 

Pedoman Teknis

Pedoman Teknis untuk Publikasi Jurnal
 
Publikasi sebuah artikel dalam Jurnal "UNIK" merupakan refleksi langsung dari kualitas karya penulis dan institusi yang mendukung mereka. Artikel yang diulas penulis mendukung dan mewujudkan berbagai metode ilmiah. Karena itu penting untuk menyepakati standar yang diharapkan untuk semua pihak yang terlibat dalam setiap penerbitan: penulis, editor jurnal, reviewer, penerbit dan masyarakat. Jurusan Pendidikan Luar Biasa Untirta sebagai penerbit Jurnal ini menjalankan tugasnya sangat serius dan kami menyadari tanggung jawab etik dan tanggung jawab kami lainnya. Kami berkomitmen untuk memastikan bahwa iklan, cetak ulang, atau pendapatan komersial lainnya tidak berdampak atau memengaruhi keputusan editorial. Selain itu, Jurusan Pendidikan Luar Biasa Untirta dan Dewan Editorial akan membantu dalam menjalin komunikasi dengan jurnal dan penerbit lain ketika diperlukan.
 
Keputusan publikasi
Para editor "UNIK" bertanggung jawab untuk memutuskan mana dari artikel yang akan  diterbitkan. Para editor akan melihat kebijakan dewan editorial jurnal dan setiap artikel yang dating akan dilihat persyaratan hukum yang berlaku terkait pencemaran nama baik, pelanggaran hak cipta, dan plagiarisme. Para editor dapat berunding dengan editor lain dalam membuat keputusan ini.
 
Keadlian
Editor setiap saat mengevaluasi naskah juga konten yang ditulis tanpa memandang ras, jenis kelamin, orientasi seksual, kepercayaan agama, asal etnis, kewarganegaraan, atau filsafat politik dari penulis.
 
Kerahasiaan
Editor dan staf editorial mana pun tidak boleh mengungkapkan informasi apa pun tentang naskah yang dikirimkan kepada siapa pun selain penulis, reviewer, penasihat editorial dan penerbit yang ditunjuk.
 
Kepentingan
Materi yang tidak dipublikasikan yang ada dalam naskah yang dikirimkan tidak boleh digunakan dalam penelitian editor sendiri tanpa persetujuan tertulis dari penulis.

 

 

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards 
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention 
Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism 
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.  

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication 
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources 
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper 
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects 
If the work involves human, animals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest 
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works 
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.