A Critical Queer Discourse Analysis of Sexual Orientation Secrecy Represented in “Love Simon”

Anna Riana Suryanti Tambunan, Emia Glory Sembiring

Abstract


The objectives of this study were to investigate the influence of sexual orientation secrecy from the utterances of main characters and author’s narration and the realization of the influence of sexual orientation found in Love Simon movie. The study was conducted using a critical discourse analysis approach. The data of this study were taken from the transcript of Love Simon. The data of this study were the main character’s utterances and author’s narration that appeared in Love Simon that can categorize into kinds of sexual orientation secrecy based on romantic secrecy.  The data analysis was taken by identifying, classifying, and analysing the data. The findings indicated 6 kinds of romantic secrecy of sexual orientation that were flouted by the main characters and author’s narration in Love Simon. Based on the research findings, the most frequent utterances were the break-up distress. This proves that the sexual orientation secrecy gives a negative influence on the main character in this movie.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Browne, K., & J Nash, C. (2010). Queer Methods and Methodologies : Intersecting Queer Theories and Social Science Research. London: Routledge.

Costas, J., & Grey, C. (2016). Secrecy at Work: The Hidden Architecture of Organizational Life. Standford: Standford University Press.

DePalma, R., & Cullen, F. (2011). The Ashgate research companion to queer theory, edited by Noreen Giffney and Michael O’Rourke. Gender and Education, 23(2), 220-222.

Fan, Z., & Grey, C. (2020). Everyday Secrecy : Boundaries of Confidential Gossip. Journal of Culture and Organization, 1-17.

Fairclough, N., and Wodak, R. 1997. Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse as Social Interaction. London: SAGE.

Flett, R. (2012). ‘‘To tell or not to tell?’’ Managing a concealable identity in the workplace. Vulnerable Groups and Inclusion, 1-9.

Foster, Creig., & Keith Campbell. (2010). Are Secret Relationships Hot, Then Not? Romantic Secrecy as a Function of Relationship Duration. The Journal of Social Psychology. 150(6), 668–688.

Foster, C. A., & Campbell, W. K. (2005). The adversity of secret relationships. Personal Relationships, 12, 125–143

Giffney, D. N. (2007). Quare Éire. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 275-298.

Grey, J. C. (2016). Secrecy at Work: The Hidden Architecture of Organizational Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Itzakhy, H., & Kissil, K. (2015). “It’s a Horrible Sin. If They Find Out, I Will Not Be Able To Stay" : Orthodox Jewish Gay Men’s Experiences Living in Secrecy. Journal of Homosexuality, 621–643.

Jones, A. (2014). Secrecy. The Annual Review of Anthropology, 53–69.

Lane , J., & Wegner, D. (1995). The Cognitive Consequences of Secrecy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 237-253.

Leeuwen, Theo Van. (2018). Moral evaluation in critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, 1-14

Smith, G., Kippax, S., & Chapple, M. (2008). Secrecy, Disclosure, and Closet. Journal of Homosexuality, 53-73.

Wismeijer, A. (2011). Self-Concealers : Do They Conceal What We Always Assumed They Do? Personality and Individual Differences, 1039-1043.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2009). “Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach.” In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.). Methods of critical discourse analysis (Vol. 2, pp. 62-86)




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/jels.v7i2.15135

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of English Language Studies

Creative Commons License
Journal of English Language Studies is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright @ 2024 Journal of English Language Studies.

View My Stats