A Gap Analysis of Yogyakarta Smart City Project (within the Dimension of Smart Governance and Smart Economy)

Ray Ferza; Melati Ayuning Pranasari; Suci Emilia Fitri; Dian Martha Indarti; Tedi Gunawan

doi:10.31506/jog.v7i1.14127

A Gap Analysis of Yogyakarta Smart City Project (within the Dimension of Smart Governance and Smart Economy)

Ray Ferza, Melati Ayuning Pranasari, Suci Emilia Fitri, Dian Martha Indarti, Tedi Gunawan

Abstract

The COVID 19 Pandemic exposed digitalization as a fundamental aspect to revive the local economy. Fortunately, Indonesia has already shifted towards a 100 Smart City for their Municipalities since 2017. Yogyakarta as one of the best SC, has suffered the impact of pandemic. In the need to explore the phenomenon of how an SC should be implemented within the circumstances, it will be relevant to describe a gap analysis on (1) Yogyakarta SC Project through the dimensions of SG and SE and (2) Strategic Solutions. This paper employed a gap analysis through a qualitative study and it uncovered gaps of the SC project such as central government intervention, sectoral quality of digitalization, and intergovernmental sync. The strategy to eclipse the Cohen SC Wheel are the followings: reinforcing the regulatory capacity, improving the app business process and features, and intensify the formal cooperation, be it inter-governmentally or between public-private.

Keywords

Smart City; Pandemic; Digitalization; E-Government

Full Text:

PDF 184-201

References

Alawadhi, S., Aldama-Nalda, A., Chourabi, H., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Leung, S., Mellouli, S., … Walker, S. (2012). Building understanding of smart city initiatives. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 7443 LNCS, 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33489-4_4

Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092

Anggraini, A. T., & Iqbal, M. (2020). The Uttilization of Jogja Smart Service Application: an E-Readiness Approach. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 7(2), 150–159. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.72130

Anthopoulos, L. G. (2017). The rise of the smart city. Public Administration and Information Technology (Vol. 22). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57015-0_2

Asmorowati, S., Schubert, V., & Ningrum, A. P. (2021). Policy capacity, local autonomy, and human agency: tensions in the intergovernmental coordination in Indonesia’s social welfare response amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 00(00), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2020.1869142

Astrid, R. R. K., Pribadi, U., & Iqbal, M. (2020). Factors that Influence E-Government Utilizing Towards E-Report Application ( Case Study : Comparasion between Lapor Sleman and Jogja Smart Service ( JSS ) In 2018 ). KKU International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(1), 1–25.

Barletta, V. S., Caivano, D., Dimauro, G., Nannavecchia, A., & Scalera, M. (2020). Managing a smart city integrated model through smart program management. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 10(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10020714

Calzada, I. (2017). The techno-politics of data and smart devolution in city-regions: Comparing glasgow, bristol, barcelona, and bilbao. Systems, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems5010018

Cohen, B., Almirall, E., & Chesbrough, H. (2016). The city as a lab: Open innovation meets the collaborative economy. California Management Review, 59(1), 5–13.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125616683951

Creswell, J. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th Edition. The New Zealand dental journal (Vol. 86). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208956

Damuri, Yose Rizal; Aswicahyono, Haryo; Hirawan, Fajar; Setiati, Ira; Simanjuntak, I. (2020). Langkah Pemberdayaan UMKM dalam Menghadapi Covid-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-67278-3_126

Dawes, S. S. (2009). Governance in the digital age: A research and action framework for an uncertain future. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.12.003

Fauzi, E. A., & Setiawan, A. (2020). Accountability Jogya Smart Service Application in Public Sector Services in Yogyakarta 2019. SSRN Electronic Journal, (August), 28–30. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3528951

Fauziyah, Cika; Priyambodo, Tri Kuntoro; Giyarsih, S. R. (2019). Kontribusi PT. TELKOM dalam Pengembangan UMKM Perkotaan di Kota Yogyakarta. Majalah Geografi Indonesia, 33(2), 14–21.

Fernandez-Anez, V., Fernández-Güell, J. M., & Giffinger, R. (2018). Smart City implementation and discourses: An integrated conceptual model. The case of Vienna. Cities, 78(December), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.12.004

Gao, Z., Wang, S., & Gu, J. (2020). Public participation in smart-city governance: А qualitative content analysis of public comments in urban China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(20), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208605

Gumilar, M. G. (2019). Inovasi Pemerintah Daerah Jogja Smart Service Dalam Menciptakan Smart and Liveable City Di Kota Yogyakarta. Jurnal Gama Societa, 3(1), 19–27.

Jiang, X. (2020). Digital economy in the post-pandemic era. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 18(4), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/14765284.2020.1855066

Kumar, H., Singh, M. K., Gupta, M. P., & Madaan, J. (2020). Moving towards smart cities: Solutions that lead to the Smart City Transformation Framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153(April), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.024

Kusnandar, V. B. (2021, October 25). Perekonomian Kulon Progo Paling Terdampak Covid-19 di DI Yogyakarta pada 2020. Katadata.Co.Id. Retrieved from https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2021/10/25/perekonomian-kulon-progo-paling-terdampak-covid-19-di-di-yogyakarta-pada-2020

Lombardi, P., Giordano, S., Farouh, H., & Yousef, W. (2012). Modelling the smart city performance. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2012.660325

Loo, B. P. Y., & Tang, W. S. M. (2019). “Mapping” Smart Cities. Journal of Urban Technology, 26(2), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2019.1576467

Monzón, A., López-Lambas, M. E., Velázquez, G., & Fernández, V. (2015). ASCIMER - Assessment Methodology for Smart City Projects: Application to the Mediterranean Region. European Investment Bank Institute, 81.

Novika, S. (2021). Baru 13% UMKM RI Pakai Teknologi Digital, Bagaimana Solusinya? Detik.Com. Retrieved from https://finance.detik.com/berita-ekonomi-bisnis/d-5359469/baru-13-umkm-ri-pakai-teknologi-digital-bagaimana-solusinya

Novriando, A. (2020). Efektivitas “Jogja Smart Service” Terhadap Pelayanan Publik di Kota Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 13(2), 68–75.

Padilla, M., Hawxwell, T., & Wendt, W. (2016). reviewed paper City Lab Lisbon – Development of a Smart Roadmap for the City of the Future Marielisa Padilla, Tom Hawxwell, Willi Wendt, 2(June), 151–159.

Peek, G., & Troxler, P. (2014). City in Transition: Urban Open Innovation Environments as a Radical Innovation. Real Corp 2014, 8(May), 151–160.

Petrova-Antonova, D., & Ilieva, S. (2019). Methodological framework for digital transition and performance assessment of smart cities. 2019 4th International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Technologies, SpliTech 2019. https://doi.org/10.23919/SpliTech.2019.8783170

Rodriguez, J. A., Fernandez, F. J., & Arboleya, P. (2018). Study of the Architecture of a Smart City. Proceedings, 2(23), 1485. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2231485

Rusqiyati, E. A. (2020, April 25). Dekranasda Yogyakarta perkirakan 70 persen UMKM terdampak COVID-19. ANTARA 2020. Retrieved from https://www.antaranews.com/berita/1443632/dekranasda-yogyakarta-perkirakan-70-persen-umkm-terdampak-covid-19

Saputra, D. (2021, March 19). Survei BI : 87,5 Persen UMKM Indonesia Terdampak Pandemi Covid-19 Artikel ini telah tayang di Bisnis.com dengan judul “Survei BI : 87,5 Persen UMKM Indonesia Terdampak Pandemi Covid-19”, Klik selengkapnya di sini: https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20210319/. Bisnis.Com. Retrieved from https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20210319/9/1370022/survei-bi-875-persen-umkm-indonesia-terdampak-pandemi-covid-19

Sharifi, A., Khavarian-Garmsir, A. R., & Kummitha, R. K. R. (2021). Contributions of smart city solutions and technologies to resilience against the covid-19 pandemic: A literature review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13148018

Unni, J. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on Informal Economy: The Revival. Indian Journal of Labour Economics, (0123456789). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-020-00265-y

Westraadt, L. (2018). A Gap Analysis of New Smart City Solutions for Integrated City Planning and Management, 145–153.

Winata, A. I. (2016, November 30). Kota Yogyakarta Raih Penghargaan UMKM Terbaik. Jogjadaily.Com. Retrieved from https://jogjadaily.com/2016/11/kota-yogyakarta-raih-penghargaan-umkm-terbaik/

Yeh, H. (2017). The effects of successful ICT-based smart city services: From citizens’ perspectives. Government Information Quarterly, 34(3), 556–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.05.001

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31506/jog.v7i1.14127