The Effectivity Of Public Services Based On Smart Goverment In Bukit Raya Distric Pekanbaru City

Harapan Tua Ricky Freddy; Willya Achmad; Mimin Sundari Nasution

doi:10.31506/jog.v7i1.14557

The Effectivity Of Public Services Based On Smart Goverment In Bukit Raya Distric Pekanbaru City

Harapan Tua Ricky Freddy, Willya Achmad, Mimin Sundari Nasution

Abstract

The Bukit Raya District in Pekanbaru City is the first sub-district to implement one of the pillars, namely E-Government, from the realization of the Pekanbaru City Vision, also known as the Smart City Madani concept. The Bukit Raya District Government of Pekanbaru City, based on Pekanbaru Mayor Regulation Number 56 of 2019, has made a transformation in the form of various public service innovations by utilizing the use of IT technology to facilitate services as one of the indicators of the pillars of smart government (Smart Government) with the vision of working hard, being disciplined, creative, innovative, and having an entrepreneurial spirit and spirit. This is intended to create clean governance and the realization of good governance in order to provide quality, fast, precise, cheap, and good public services. The research problem that will be answered is how effective the transformation of public services based on Smart Government is applied in Bukit Raya District, Pekanbaru City. The theory used refers to the opinion of Bryson (2002) about hexagonal services, which rests on the assumption that services that are considered effective must go through a market test in the Service Management System. The research method used is qualitative with a case study approach. Relevant analysis methods are performance analysis techniques, individual experiences, and institutional behavior (Moeleong, 2006; Bugin, 2011). The results showed that the effectiveness of the transformation of public services based on "Smart-Government" carried out by the Bukit Raya District Government in Pekanbaru City was classified as less effective. This is due to, the service management system factor, which has relatively many application menus and makes it difficult for users; limited human resources in the field of information technology; limited smartphone ownership; data and information that is less continuous and transparent about development programs; and others. In addition, the online-based service designs are not supported by a database of community needs, so that people still feel less satisfied, less fluent, and less able to do business. Research recommendations include simplifying the standard standards of smart-government-based public service systems into one internet website application with a comprehensive menu of applications according to the needs of the community.

Keywords

Public Service, Effectiveness and Smart Government

Full Text:

PDF 239-259

References

Atik dan Ratmin (2006), Ikhwal Administrasi Publik. Penerbit, Rosdakarya Bandung.

Bryson, Jhon, M. (2002). Perencanaan Strategis Bagi Organisasi Sosial. Penerbit, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.

Basrowi, Drs, MPd dan Suwandi, Drs, MSi, 2008. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Penerbit, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Burhan, Bungin, 2011. Penelitian Kualitatif, Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya, Edisi Kedua, Penerbit, Kencana, Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.

Bogdan, Robert C and Taylor, K.B, 1992. Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods : A Phenomenological Approach in The Sosial Sciences. John Willey and Sons. Alih Bahasa, Arief F, P. Usaha Nasional, Surabaya.

Chen, L., & Aklikokou, A. K. (2021), Relating E-Government Development to Government Effectiveness and Control of Corruption : a Cluster Analysis. Journal of Chinese Governance, 6(1), 155-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2019.1698693

Creswell, J. W. (2016), Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Pustaka Belajar

Dharmanu, I. P. (2017), Modernisasi dan Inovasi dalam Pelayanan Publik Melalui E-Government di Kota Denpasar. Jurnal ADHUM, VII(2), 93–107.

Freddy, Harapan Tua Ricky, Komitmen Pelayanan Sistem Informasi Desa di Pulau Terluar Terdepan Indonesia, Penerbit Taman Karya, Pekanbaru, 2019.

Harahap, D. R., Badaruddin, B., & Harahap, R. H. (2021), Efektivitas Penerapan Sistem E-Planning Dalam Perencanaan Pembangunan di Pemerintahan Kabupaten Tapanuli Selatan. PERSPEKTIF, 10(1), 76-87. https://doi.org/10.31289/perspektif.v10i1.4073

Hardiyansyah. (2011), Kualitas Pelayanan Publik. Konsep, Dimensi, Indikator, dan Implementasinya. Gava Media.

Hayat. (2017), Manajemen Pelayanan Publik. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Koyi, G., Tembo, J. M., & Sichinsambwe, C. M. (2021), Factors Influencing Union Effectiveness In The Public Service in Zambia: Associations and mediating effect. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 42(3), 504-530. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0143831X18780334

Lisan Tangki 2005, Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik, Dalam Paulus Efendie Lotulung, Himpunan Makalah Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik, Diterbitkan oleh, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Mayarni, Meilani, N. L., & Zulkarnaini, (2018). Kualitas Pelayanan Publik Bagi Kaum Difabel. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik, 9(1–68), 11–18.

Moeleong, Lexy, J., 2006. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Penerbit, Rosda Karya, Bandung.

Miftah.,Thoha, 1996., Dimensi-dimensi Prima Ilmu Administrasi Negara., Raja Grafindo Persada., Jakarta.

Mustapadidjaja, 2003. Etika Pemerintahan. Penerbit, PT RINEKA CIPTA. Jakarta.

Moenir., 1992., Manajemen Pelayanan Umum di Indonesia., Penerbit, PT. Bumi Aksara., Jakarta.

Ratminto, Winarsih, 2005, Manajemen Pelayanan, Penerbit, Pustaka Pelajar, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta.

Peraturan Daerah Kota Pekanbaru Nomor 5 Tahun 2020. Tentang Perubahan atas PERDA Kota Pekanbaru Nomor 9 Tahun 2016 Tentang Pembentukan dan Susunan Perangkat Daerah Kota Pekanbaru. Pemerintah Kota Pekanbaru.

Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia, Nomor 20 Tahun 2018. Tentang Pedoman Evaluasi Kelembagaan Instansi Pemerintah, Kementerian PAN-RB, Jakarta.

Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia, Nomor 24 Tahun 2020. Tentang Rencana Strategis Tahun 2020-2024, Kementerian PAN-RB, Jakarta.

Reformasi Aparatur Negara Untuk Melaksanakan Tata Pemerintahan Yang Baik, 2006. Makalah disampaikan pada Seminar Nasional AIPI, Reformasi Birokrasi dan Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia, 3-4 Mei, Medan Sumatera Utara.

Suparlan., 1994., Manajemen Pelayanan Masyarakat., Edisi Ke-2., LAN., Jakarta.

Sampara Lukman dan Sutopo., 2003., Pelayanan Prima., Penerbit, LAN., Jakarta.

Toha, Miftah, 2002. Seminar Good Goverance , Bappenas, Jakarta. Tanggal 24 Oktober, Guru Besar Ilmu Administrasi Publik UGM, Yogyakarta Toha, Miftah, 2002. Seminar Good Goverance , Bappenas, Jakarta. Tanggal 24 Oktober 2002, Guru Besar Ilmu Administrasi Publik UGM, Yogyakarta.

Thomas, N. (2021), Knowing Self, Knowing Others: A Critical Exploration of Self-Awareness and Its Relevance to Leader Effectiveness Across All Levels of the Welsh Public Service (Doctoral disertation, University of South Wales (United Kingdom).

Wismanu, R. E., Nuh, M., Widodo, N., & Aziz, N. A. (2019). Model Inovasi Pemerintah Daerah Bidang Pelayanan Perizinan dalam Mewujudkan Smart City (Studi Pendekatan Sistem Dinamik pada Pemerintah Kabupaten Sragen). Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik, 4(4), 369-376.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31506/jog.v7i1.14557