Regulation of Commercial Dispute Settlement Mediation in the Perspective of Legal Assurance and Justice

Umar Hasan; Suhermi Suhermi; Sasmiar Sasmiar

doi:10.31506/jog.v7i1.14711

Regulation of Commercial Dispute Settlement Mediation in the Perspective of Legal Assurance and Justice

Umar Hasan, Suhermi Suhermi, Sasmiar Sasmiar

Abstract

The Indonesian government is currently trying to formulate an appropriate and up-to-date formula for making regulations on mediation and settlement of commercial disputes. This is done by the Indonesian government to support various policies that have been made to ensure legal certainty so that investment develops. Therefore, the authors are interested in bringing up the theme of this scientific article by analyzing comparative studies between Indonesia and Malaysia; The analysis in this article is about the mediation arrangement for the settlement of commercial disputes in Indonesia by comparing with Malaysia to achieve legal certainty and justice. The research method used is normative juridical. The results of the study show that the regulation of mediation for the settlement of commercial disputes in Indonesia as regulated in Law Number 30 of 1999 in substance and structure does not meet legal certainty and justice. Meanwhile in Malaysia, the arrangements for dispute resolution mediation regulated in the Kuala Lumpur Regional Arbitration Center Mediation Regulations and the 2012 Mediation Law (UU 749) have met legal certainty and justice. In the future, the concept of regulating commercial dispute settlement mediation in Indonesia, its substance and structure must meet legal certainty and justice. This scientific article concludes that the concept of regulating commercial dispute resolution mediation in Indonesia must be regulated separately because in substance and structure, mediation and arbitration have different principles. It is preferable that the regulations that will be made in the future must involve various parties related to the business world to produce representative regulations both nationally, regionally and internationally; if necessary, Indonesia becomes an alternative legal model for dispute resolution through mediation.

Keywords

Regulation, Dispute Resolution Mediation, Legal Certainty and Justice

Full Text:

PDF 323-334

References

Arwana, Y. C., & Arifin, R. (2019). Jalur Mediasi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Sebagai Dorongan Pemenuhan Hak Asasi Manusia. Jambura Law Review, 1(2), 212-236.

Bradshaw, W., Roseborough, D., & Umbreit, M. S. (2006). The Effect of Victim Offender Mediation on Juvenile Offender Recidivism: A Meta‐Analysis. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 24(1), 87-98.

Diah, M. M. (2016). Prinsip dan Bentuk-Bentuk Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Luar Pengadilan. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat, 5(2).

Erwin, M. (2015). Filsafat Hukum: Refleksi Kritis Terhadap Hukum dan Hukum Indonesia (dalam Dimensi Ide dan Aplikasi). Jakarta; Raja Grafindo Persada.

Faiz, P. M. (2009). Teori Keadilan John Rawls (John Rawls' Theory of Justice). Jurnal Konstitusi, 6(1), 135-149.

Hamda, A. (2012). Politik & Kerajaan. Kuala Lumpur: Freemind Horozons Sdn.Bhd.

Hanifah, M. (2016). Kajian Yuridis: Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Di Pengadilan. ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata, 2(1), 1-13.

Hidayah, K. (2017). Konstruksi Pengaturan Mediasi Melalui Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pajak Di Indonesia (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Brawijaya).

Khan, H. B A. (2017). Kerangka Kerja Dan Struktur Hukum Mediasi Masyarakat Di Malaysia. Universitas Islam Internasional Malaysia.

Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution.

Malaysia Mediation Act 2012 (Act 749).

Marzuki, P. M. (2010). Penelitian Hukum, Volume 3. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media.

Mubarok, N. (2021). Sistem Pemerintahan di Negara-Negara Rumpun Melayu. SOSIO YUSTISIA, 1(1), 126-155.

Mulyana, D. (2019). Kekuatan Hukum Hasil Mediasi di Dalam Pengadilan Dan di Luar Pengadilan Menurut Hukum Positif. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 3(2), 177-198.

Nasution, B. J. (2008). Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Nasution, B. J. (2015). Hukum dan Keadilan. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Nugroho, H. (2020). Membangun Lingkungan Integrtias Pengadilan Untuk Melawan Tindak Pidana Gratifikasi. Prosiding, 9(1).

Nurhardianto, F. (2015). Sistem Hukum dan Posisi Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Tapis: Jurnal Teropong Aspirasi Politik Islam, 11(1), 33-44.

Putra, I. S., Santoso, B., & Benuf, K. (2021). Online Dispute Resolution sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Financial Technology di Indonesia. Simbur Cahaya, 27(2), 1-22.

Rahardjo, S. (1991). Ilmu Hukum [Law Science]. Edition III. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Rahmadi, T. (2011). Mediasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Pendekatan Mufakat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Rahmah, D. M. (2019). Optimalisasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Mediasi Di Pengadilan. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 4(1), 1-16.

Regulation of the Supreme Court Number 1 of 2008 concerning Mediation Procedures in Court.

Rusli, T. (2012). Penyelesaian Sengketa Antara Konsumen Dan Pelaku Usaha Menurut Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Keadilan Progresif, 3(1).

Syahrani, H. R. (2008). Rangkuman Intisari Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya.

Syukur, F. A. (2012). Mediasi Yudisial Di Indonesia: Peluang Dan Tantangan Dalam Memajukan Sistem Peradilan. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Talib, I. (2013). Bentuk Putusan Penyelesaian Sengketa Berdasarkan Mediasi. Lex et Societatis, 1(1).

Usman, R. (2003). Pilihan Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Wiguna, M. O. C. (2018). Peluang Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Tentang Tanah Melalui Alternative Dispute Resolution dengan Asas-Asas Hukum Perjanjian di Dalamnya. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 48(3), 506-520.

Zainuddin, A. (2018). Eksistensi Teori Hukum Inklusif dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional. Jurnal Al Himayah, 2(1), 17-30.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31506/jog.v7i1.14711