Prevention of Corruption in the Procurement Process of Government Goods and Services in The Digital Era

Parningotan Malau

doi:10.31506/jog.v7i2.15168

Prevention of Corruption in the Procurement Process of Government Goods and Services in The Digital Era

Parningotan Malau

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to undertake a legal analysis of the anti-corruption procurement process for government goods and services through the use of good governance. The research approach employed in this study is a normative juridical one, which involves studying legislative rules and examining corrupt activities that occur in the sphere of procurement of goods and services. The sources of law in this study are material law sources and traditional legal sources. Based on the analysis of legal authorities, it can be concluded that the criminal act of corruption in the procurement of government goods and services has violated the regulations in Article 2 paragraph (1) of Law No. 31 of 1999 and Law No. 20 of 2001 on Corruption. The implementation of good governance in preventing corruption in the procurement of goods and services is seen from two aspects, namely internal and external aspects. Internal elements include improving the quality of internal resources in government organizations and increasing accountability and transparency. In contrast, external elements increase community participation, legitimacy, and anti-corruption socialization through various media.

Keywords

Analysis, Prevention, Crime, Corruption, Good Governance

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adam, I., & Fazekas, M. (2021). Are Emerging Technologies Helping Win the Fight Against Corruption? A Review of the State of Evidence. Information Economics and Policy, 57, 100950.

Adegbite, E. (2015). Good Corporate Governance in Nigeria: Antecedents, Propositions and Peculiarities. International Business Review, 24(2), 319-330.

Alfada, A. (2019). The Destructive Effect of Corruption on Economic Growth in Indonesia: A Threshold Model. Heliyon, 5(10), e02649.

Alfianto, D. (2019). Peran Aparat Pengawas Intern Pemerintah (APIP) untuk Mewujudkan Good Governance dalam Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Bidang Penyediaan Barang dan Jasa. Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan Hukum, 1(2).

Arwati, D., & Latif, D. V. (2019). Factors Inhibiting Public Participation in Corruption Prevention through E-Government Application in Indonesia. Global Business & Management Research, 11(1).

Astafurova, O. A., Borisova, A. S., Golomanchuk, E. V., & Omelchenko, T. А. (2020). Anti-Corruption Education of Public Officers using Digital Technologies. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(2), 90-94.

Brennan, N. M., Subramaniam, N., & Van Staden, C. J. (2019). Corporate Governance Implications of Disruptive Technology: An Overview. The British Accounting Review, 51(6), 100860.

Dávid-Barrett, E., & Fazekas, M. (2020). Anti-Corruption in Aid-Funded Procurement: Is Corruption Reduced or Merely Displaced?. World Development, 132, 105000.

Ferdinand, A. K., Sunarto, D. M., & Shafira, M. (2020). Penegakan Hukum dalam Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah oleh Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) dan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK). Cepalo, 4(2), 111-128.

Jeppesen, K. K. (2019). The Role of Auditing in the Fight Against Corruption. The British Accounting Review, 51(5), 100798.

Kurniawan, M. R., & Pujiyono, P. (2018). Modus Operandi Korupsi Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah oleh PNS. Law Reform, 14(1), 115-131.

Kusumaastuti, S. H., & Mahmud, A. (2022, January). Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa di Lingkungan Badan Pelaksana Kegiatan Usaha Hulu Minyak dan Gas Bumi (BPMIGAS). In Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies (Vol. 2, No. 1).

Li, Y., Zhang, B., Fan, D., & Li, Z. (2021). Digital media, Control of Corruption, and Emerging Multinational Enterprise’s FDI Entry Mode Choice. Journal of Business Research, 130, 247-259.

Lombardi, R., Trequattrini, R., Cuozzo, B., & Cano-Rubio, M. (2019). Corporate Corruption Prevention, Sustainable Governance and Legislation: First Exploratory Evidence from the Italian Scenario. Journal of Cleaner Production, 217, 666-675.

Mackey, T. K., & Cuomo, R. E. (2020). An Interdisciplinary Review of Digital Technologies to Facilitate Anti-Corruption, Transparency and Accountability in Medicines Procurement. Global health action, 13(sup1), 1695241.

Mahardhika, V. (2021). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pejabat Pembuat Komitmen sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Korupsi Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 16(1), 140-155.

Malau, S. (2019). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dalam Hal Tidak Dilaksanakannya Perlindungan Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja Pekerja/Buruh di Tempat Kerja (Doctoral Dissertation, Universitas Sumatera Utara)

Merhi, M. I., & Ahluwalia, P. (2018). Digital Economy and Corruption Perceptions: A Cross-Country Analysis. International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 18.

Mungiu-Pippidi, A., & Heywood, P. M. (Eds.). (2020). A Research Agenda for Studies of Corruption. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Mutungi, F., Baguma, R., Janowski, T., & University Krems, Austria, D. (2019, June). Towards Digital Anti-Corruption Typology for Public Service Delivery. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 484-494).

Nayabarani, S. D. (2018). Membangun Transparansi Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Melalui Peningkatan Peran ICT dalam Mereduksi Korupsi. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 47(4), 477-496.

Neu, D., Everett, J., & Rahaman, A. S. (2015). Preventing Corruption within Government Procurement: Constructing the Disciplined and Ethical Subject. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 28, 49-61.

Ntim, C. G., Lindop, S., & Thomas, D. A. (2013). Corporate Governance and Risk Reporting in South Africa: A Study of Corporate Risk Disclosures in the Pre-and Post-2007/2008 Global Financial Crisis Periods. International Review of Financial Analysis, 30, 363-383.

Prakoso, S. (2020). Penggunaan Dakwaan Berbentuk Subsidair dalam Penuntutan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa dan Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Mengadili (Studi Putusan Nomor: 44/PidSus-TPK/2018/PN Mdn).

Rengganis, C., Nurunnisa, M., & Maulana, M. S. (2021). Korupsi, Droit De Suit pada Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah. Indonesian Rich Journal, 2(2), 1-8.

Ridwan, R., Thalib, H., & Djanggih, H. (2020). Fungsi Kepolisian dalam Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa. Journal of Lex Theory (JLT), 1(1), 116-128.

Sikka, P., & Lehman, G. (2015). The Supply-Side of Corruption and Limits to Preventing Corruption within Government Procurement and Constructing Ethical Subjects. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 28, 62-70.

Simangungsong, M., & Siregar, S. M. (2021). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi yang Melakukan Korupsi Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa. Nommensen Journal of Legal Opinion, 2(02), 215-231.

Syamsuddin, A. R. (2020). Pembuktian Penyalahgunaan Wewenang dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa. Jambura Law Review, 2(2), 161-181.

Uyar, A., Fernandes, V., & Kuzey, C. (2021). The Mediating Role of Corporate Governance between Public Governance and Logistics Performance: International Evidence. Transport Policy, 109, 37-47.

Widoyoko, J. D. (2018). Politik, Patronase dan Pengadaan: Studi Kasus Korupsi Proyek Wisma Atlet. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 4(2), 1-23.

Wijaya, F. (2019). Kajian Yuridis Fungsi Pencegahan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Secara Elektronik di Provinsi DKI Jakarta. Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 1(2), 825-849.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31506/jog.v7i2.15168