Sound Governance Analysis: Local Government Partnership Model In Village Community Empowerment
Abstract
Sound governance reviews the partnership model between regions and civil society and international actors. International actors used as the unit of analysis in this study are PT Hyup Syung Purbalingga. This research is motivated by the results of a preliminary pre-survey, namely the absence of sustainability in the Padamara Village Community Empowerment Program conducted based on a partnership between the Padamara village government, PT Hyup Sung, and the Bojanegara Village Community. This study will further analyze the issue of partnership in Bojanegara Village Community Empowerment from a sound governance perspective, focusing on the involvement of PT Hyup Syung as an international actor in the process. This study is a type of descriptive research with a qualitative approach. Data obtained through key informants (key people) are determined purposively (purposive). The key person in this study is the executor of the Local Government, while other informants are some officials from PT. Hyup Sung Indonesia, and the villagers who were touched by the program were then determined by a snowball. In addition, documentation and observation studies are also used to capture relevant data. The presence of international parties participating in community empowerment in Indonesia, especially in the Purbalingga Regency, has not been realized as a potential. This is due to the limited resources of local governments as the sole actor in development, which should force the government to maximize any potential resource support from outside sources, whether private, public, or international. The form of partnership is an ideal desired by sound governance but has not been understood by the government at both the Purbalingga Regency government level and the Bojanegara village government level. In other words, positive partnerships between local governments, village governments, and NGOs have not occurred under the management of PT. Hyup Sung Indonesia.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ansoff, I., 1965. Corporate Strategy. McGraw Hill, New York, NY.
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4), 216–224.
Butler, T. & Waldroop. J (2004). Understanding “people” people. Harvard Business Review, 78-79.
Carpentier, N. (2016). Beyond the ladder of participation: An analytical toolkit for the critical analysis of participatory media processes. The Public, 23(1), 70–88.
Clarke, T., 1998. The stakeholder corporation: A business philosophy for the information age. Long-Range Plan. 31 (2), 182–194.
Creswell, John W. (2014). Pendekatan Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Campuran (Edisi Keempat dalam Bahasa Indonesia). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Domai, Tjahjanulin. 2011. Governance. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya Press.
Dwiyanto, Agus. (2008). Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalui Pelayanan Publik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press
Freeman, R.E., 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pittman, Boston
Ganie Rohman, 2000. Good Governance, Prinsip , Komponen, dan Penerapannya dalam Hak Asasi Manusia (Penyelenggaraan Negara yang Baik). Penerbit Komnas HAM:Jakarta.
Gustafsson, S. & Mignon, I. (2019). Municipalities as Intermediaries For The Design and Local Implementation of Climate Visions. European Planning Studies. 28(6). 1161-1182. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1612327
Hasibuan, Nurimansjah. 1993. Pemerataan dan Pembangunan Ekonomni : Teori dan Kebijaksanaan, Penerbit Universitas Sriwijaya.
Heblich Hirschey, M., Kose, J., Anil, M. (Eds.), 2009. Corporate Governance and Firm Performance. Journal of Corporate Finance Vol. 6. JAI Press, Bingley, UK.
Heriyanto, Y., Sari, N. 2021. Pengaruh Good Governance, Reformasi Administrasi Perpajakan Dan Sanksi Administrasi Pajak Terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Restoran Pada Wilayah Administrasi Kecamatan Cempaka Putih Jakarta Pusat. Jurnal Pajak Vokasi. 3 (1) : 3.
Huesca, R. (2008). Tracing the history of participatory communication approaches to development: A critical appraisal. In J. Servaes (Ed.). Communication for development and social change (pp. 180–200). New Delhi: SAGE.
Jennings, L. B., Parra-Medina, D. M., Hilfinger-Messias, D. K., & McLoughlin, K. (2006). Toward a critical social theory of youth empowerment. Journal of Community Practice, 14(1–2), 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1300/J125v14n01_03
K. Wong C, Fearon G. Philip, (2007), Understanding eGovernment and governance: stakeholders, partnerships and CSR, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 24 Iss 9 pp. 927 943.
Koiman, Jan. (2003). Governing As Governance. London : Sage Publications.
Laverack G (2007) Health Promotion Practice: Building Empowered Communities. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Lee, Judith. 2001. The Empowerment Approach to Social Work Practice Building the Beloved Community. New York: Columbia University Press.
Miles, Huberman, & Saldana. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. California: Sage publication Inc.
Nastiti, Pamuji Tri. 2013. Dua Investor Korea Bangun Pabrik Bulu Mata Rp35 Miliar di Purbalingga. https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20130718/257/151678/dua-investor-korea-bangun-pabrik-bulu-mata-rp35-miliar-di-purbalingga. Tanggal diakses 14 Juni 2020.
Palermo, V. Bertoldi, P. Apostolou, M., Kona, A., & Rivas, S. (2020). Assessment of Climate Change Mitigation Policies in 315 Cities in The Covenant of Mayors Initiative. Sustainable Cities and Society, 60. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102258
Pearrow, M. M., & Pollack, S. (2009). Youth empowerment in oppressive systems: opportunities for school consultants. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 19(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474410802494911
Peterson, N. A. (2014). Empowerment theory: clarifying the nature of higher-order multidimensional constructs. American Journal of Community Psychology, 53(1–2), 96–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-013-9624-0
Pierre, J., & Peters, B. (2005). Governing Complex Societies: Trajectories and Scenarios Palgrave, Macmillan: Basingstoke.
Piron, L. H., & Watkins, F. (2004). DFID Human Rights Review: A review of how DFID has integrated human rights into its work. DFID.
Prianto, A. L. 2011. Good Governance dan Formasi Kebijakan Publik Neo-Liberal. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara. 1 (1) : 2.
Rakhmat. 2009. Teori Administrasi dan Manajemen Publik. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara. 1 (1) : 9.
Rochman, G. 2000. Good Governance Prinsip Komponen dan Penerapannya Dalam Hak Asasi Manusia. Jurnal Penyelenggaraan Negara Yang Baik. 2 (1) : 38.
Rosidin, Abidarin dan Fariaji, Anggraeni. (2003). Reinventing Governance Demokrasi dan Reformasi Pelayanan Publik. Yogyakarta : Andi Yogyakarta
Salem, I. E., Elbaz, A. M., Elkhwesky, Z., & Mansour, K. M. (2021). The COVID-19 Pandemic: The Mitigating Role of Government and Hotel Support of Hotel Employees in Egypt. Tourism Management. 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.1043-5
Sedarmayanti. (2004). Good Governance (Kepemerintahan yang baik) Bagian Kedua Membangun Sistem manajemen Kinerja Guna Meningkatkan Produktivitas Menuju Good Governance. Bandung: Mandar Maju
Stoker, G. 1991. The Politics of Local Government. Edisi 2. London: Mac Millan.
UN General Assembly. (2015). Transforming our World : The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
Waisbord, S. (2014). The Strategic politics of participatory communication. In K. G. Wilkins, T. Tufte, & R. Obregon (Eds.), The Handbook of development communication and social change (pp. 147–167). West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Inc,.
Wallerstein N (2002) Empowerment to reduce health disparities. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 30: 72–77.
Wiratraman, H. P. 2008. Good Governance dan Mitos Ketatanegaraan Neo-Liberal. Jurnal Bersatu. Edisi Mei 2008.
Woolcock M and Sweetser AT (2002) Bright ideas: Social capital—the bonds that connect. Skerratt S and Steiner A (2013) Working with communities-of-place. Local Economy 28: 320–338.
Yazici, H., 2009. The role of project management maturity and organizational culture in perceived performance. Proj. Manag. J. 40 (3), 14–33.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31506/jog.v7i4.16656
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
⟨Recent Issues⟩ | ⟨Upcoming Issues⟩ |
Recent Issues
Volume 6, Issue 2: (2021) | Volume 6, Issue 1: (2021) | Volume 5, Issue 2: (2020) | Volume 5, Issue 1: (2020) | Volume 4, Issue 2 (2019) |