Development of System Dynamic Models for Improving E-Governments Performance Local Governments in Lampung Province

Ida Nurhaida; Andi Windah; Nina Yudha Aryanti; Arif Sugiono

doi:10.31506/jog.v8i1.17984

Development of System Dynamic Models for Improving E-Governments Performance Local Governments in Lampung Province

Ida Nurhaida, Andi Windah, Nina Yudha Aryanti, Arif Sugiono

Abstract

Abstract: The development of communication and information technology requires the adaptation of all elements of society, including Government of Indonesia. Referring to the various dynamics of e-government problems, it is deemed necessary to develop dynamic system model to improve the e-government performance of local governments, especially in Lampung Province. The research is aimed at developing a model that can be simulated for improving e-Government performance by measuring the qualitative contribution of each component, both the ICT component and the social component that will be produced in this study, which can be useful for every local government in Lampung Province in accelerating and developing e -government. The research’s model is done using VENSIM application for modeling and simulating complex systems in a variety of variables to improve the local government performance. This research finds that there are five main variables that constructed the improvement of e-government of local government performance: (1) e-government policies, HR, infrastructure, and management; (2) service, (3) performance, (4) community/user, and (5) quality of community life. The dynamic model can be further seen in the appendix.

Keywords

E-Government; Development; Dynamic Model; ICT; Social

Full Text:

PDF 101-116

References

Avianto, Teten W. 2010. System Dynamic. Bandung: ITN

Bappenas. 2010. Peta Jalan Percepatan Pencapaian Tujuan Pembangunan Milenium. Jakarta:Kementrian Pembangunan Nasional.

Banerjee, P., & Chau, P. Y. K. 2004. An Evaluative Framework for analysing e-Government Convergence Capability in Developing Countries. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 1(1), 29-48.

Bieron, B., & Ahmed, U. (2015). Services, International Rulemaking, and the Digitization of Global Commerce.

Chang, I. 2003. Assesing the Dimension of Principals Effective Technology Leadership: An Apllication of Structural Equation Modeling: Educational Forum., 6(1)

Coursey, D., & Norris, D. F. (2008). Models of e‐government: Are they correct? An empirical assessment. Public Administration Review, 68(3), 523–536.

Furuholt, B., & Wahid, F. (2008). E-government Challenges and the Role of Political Leadership in Indonesia: the Case of Sragen. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008), 411.

Hanna, N. K. 2007. e-Leadership Institutions for the Knowledge Economy. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.

Hermana, B., & Silfianti, W. (2011). Evaluating e-government implementation by local government: digital divide in internet based public services in Indonesia. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(3).

Hwang, J., & Syamsuddin, I. (2008). Failure of e-government implementation: A case study of South Sulawesi. 2008 Third International Conference on Convergence and Hybrid Information Technology, 2, 952–960.

Khotimah, Bain Khusnul. Teori Simulasi dan Pemodelan: Konsep, Aplikasi dan Terapan. Ponorogo: Wade Group.

Lam, J and Lee, M. 2005. Bridging The Digital Divide, The Roles of Internet Self-Efficacy towards Learning Computer and the Internet among Elderly in Hong Kong, China. System Science Preceeding of the 38th, Annual Hawai Conference: 03-06. Univeristy of Hong Kong.

Mangkunegara, Anwar Pabu. 2003. Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Refika Aditama. Bandung.

Martoyo, Susilo. 2000. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. BPFE. Yogyakarta

Napitupulu, D., & Sensuse, D. I. (2014). Toward maturity model of e-Government implementation based on success factors. 2014 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information System, 108–112.

Notoatmodjo Soekidjo. 1998. Pengembangan Sumber Daya Aparatur, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Pudjianto, B., Zo, H., Ciganek, A. P., & Rho, J.-J. (2011). Determinants of e-government assimilation in Indonesia: An empirical investigation using a TOE framework. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 21(1), 49–80.

Quah, J. S. T. (2020). Combating police corruption in five Asian countries: a comparative analysis. Asian Education and Development Studies, 9(2), 197–216.

Rokhman, A. (2011). e-Government adoption in developing countries; the case of Indonesia. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, 2(5), 228–236.

Sabani, A., Deng, H., & Thai, V. (2019). Evaluating the development of E-government in Indonesia. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Software Engineering and Information Management, 254–258.

Santosa, Panji. 2009. Administrasi Publik, Teori dan Aplikasi Good Governance. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Suki, N. M., & Ramayah, T. (2010). User acceptance of the e-government services in Malaysia: structural equation modelling approach. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 5, 395.

Sutopo, B., Wulandari, T. R., Adiati, A. K., & Saputra, D. A. (2017). E-government, audit opinion, and performance of local government administration in Indonesia. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 11(4), 6–22.

UNCTAD. 2011. Measuring The Impact of Information and Communication Technology for Development, Switzerland, Unitend Nations.

UNDESA. 2012. United Nation e-Government Survey 2012: e-Government for people, New York, United Nations.

Wahyuni, S., Astuti, E. S., & Utari, K. M. (2013). Critical outlook at special economic zone in Asia: a comparison between Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand and China. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 28(3), 336–346.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31506/jog.v8i1.17984