Analysis of Stakeholders Regional Innovation Based on Government Collaboration in Indragiri Hilir Regency

Ismail Ismail; Sri Hartati; Dini Adhania; Abd Salam

doi:10.31506/jog.v7i4.17992

Analysis of Stakeholders Regional Innovation Based on Government Collaboration in Indragiri Hilir Regency

Ismail Ismail, Sri Hartati, Dini Adhania, Abd Salam

Abstract

Government performance and regional competitiveness can be increased through regional innovation involving various stakeholders. The existence of stakeholders is adjusted to their roles and responsibilities so that the results achieved can run optimally. This study aims to identify the stakeholders involved and analyze their roles based on power and interest. This study uses a qualitative approach with stakeholder analysis techniques. The results of the stakeholder analysis show grouping in two contexts, namely, primary stakeholders, namely, the central and regional governments, as well as secondary stakeholders, consisting of the community, academics, entrepreneurs, and the mass media. To support success in implementing regional innovation, an analysis of the role of each stakeholder is carried out. The results of the analysis show that stakeholders are divided into four categories based on power and interest: subjects, key players, crowd, and contest setters. The division of roles and responsibilities among each stakeholder can accelerate the process of implementing regional innovations in Indragiri Hilir Regency.

Keywords

innovative government; collaborative government; stakeholders analysis.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aditama Azmy Musaddad, W.K. Faizin Ahzani, M. S. dan L. A. (2015). IMPLEMENTASI SISTEM PELAYANAN RAKYAT SIDOARJO (SIPRAJA) SEBAGAI INOVASI PELAYANAN PUBLIK. Aditama Azmy Musaddad, W.K. Faizin Ahzani, Mei Susilowati Dan Lukman Arif, 3(April), 49–58.

BAPPEDA INHIL. (2022). Rilis Inovasi Daerah Kab Indragiri HIlir.

Bracke, M.B.M., De Greef, K.H. and Hopster, H. (2005). Qualitative Stakeholder Analysis For The Development Of Sustainable Monitoring Systems For Farm Animal Welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics.

Bryson, J. M. (2004). What To Do When Stakeholders Matter: A Guide to Stakeholder Identification and Analysis Techniques. Public Management Review.

Carayannis, E. G., Grigoroudis, E., Campbell, D. F., Meissner, D., & Stamati, D. (2018). The ecosystem as helix: an exploratory theory‐building study of regional co‐opetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems as Quadruple/Quintuple Helix Innovation Models. R&d Management, 48(1), 148-162.

Etin Indrayani. (2011). e-government Konsep, Implementasi dan Perkembangannya di Indonesia. In Academia.Edu (Issue 022). https://www.academia.edu/download/60457564/Buku_E-government20190901-116843-z73m6i.pdf

Fatmawati, F., Mustari, N., Haerana, H., Niswaty, R., & Abdillah, A. (2022). Waste Bank Policy Implementation through Collaborative Approach: Comparative Study—Makassar and Bantaeng, Indonesia. Sustainability, 14(13), 7974.

Freeman, C. (1997). The Economic of Industrial Innovation. Routledge.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management. A Stakeholder Approach. University of Minnesota. Massachusetts. Pitman Publishing Inc.

Freddy, H. T. R., Achmad, W., & Nasution, M. S. (2022). The Effectivity Of Public Services Based On Smart Goverment In Bukit Raya Distric Pekanbaru City. Journal of Governance, 7(1), 239-259.

Höglund, L., & Linton, G. (2018). Smart specialization in regional innovation systems: a quadruple helix perspective. R&D Management, 48(1), 60-72.

Ilhami, R., Endah Marlovia, E. M., & Achmad, W. (2022). Smart government policy implementation for smart city concept realization. International Journal of Health Sciences Scopus coverage years: from 2021 to Present, 8379-8389.

Kreiling, L., Serval, S., Peres, R., & Bounfour, A. (2020). University technology transfer organizations: Roles adopted in response to their regional innovation system stakeholders. Journal of Business Research, 119, 218-229.

Lubis, B. (2022). Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Daerah Yang Inovatif dan Kolaboratif Dimasa Pandemi Covid 19 di Kota Cimahi.

Mayangsari, L., & Novani, S. (2015). Multi-stakeholder co-creation analysis in smart city management: an experience from Bandung, Indonesia. Procedia Manufacturing, 4, 315-321.

Rastogi, A., Badola, R., Hussain, S. A., and Hickey, G. M. (2010). Assessing the Utility of Stakeholder Analysis to Protected Areas Management: The Case of Corbett National Park, India. Biological Conservation.

Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder Participation for Environmental Management: A Literature Review. Biological Conservation, 141, 2417-2431.

Purwanda, E., & Achmad, W. (2022). Environmental Concerns in the Framework of General Sustainable Development and Tourism Sustainability. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 13(7), 1911-1917.

Wakka, A. K. (2014). Analisis Stakeholders Pengelolaan Kawasan Hutan Dengan Tujuan Khusus (KHDTK) Mengkendek, Kabupaten Tana Toraja, Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal Penelitian Kehutanan Wallacea, 3(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.18330/jwallacea.2014.vol3iss1pp47-55

Wood, D. J. dan B. G. (1991). Towards a Comprehensive Theory of Collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. Vol.27, Halaman 139-162.

Zhao, S. L., Cacciolatti, L., Lee, S. H., & Song, W. (2015). Regional collaborations and indigenous innovation capabilities in China: A multivariate method for the analysis of regional innovation systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 94, 202-220.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31506/jog.v7i4.17992