Policy Network on Village Development in Bandung Regency (Study on Community-Based Housing and Settlement Development)

Entang Adhy Muhtar; Riswanda Riswanda

doi:10.31506/jog.v8i2.19107

Policy Network on Village Development in Bandung Regency (Study on Community-Based Housing and Settlement Development)

Entang Adhy Muhtar, Riswanda Riswanda

Abstract

Rural development, especially the construction of community-based housing and settlement areas in Bandung Regency in general, has not yet touched on the basic issue of increasing people's welfare through the development of integrated and sustainable residential areas. Development is still limited to physical improvements and institutional roles and involvement among stakeholders that are not yet integrated, both in planning, implementation, and regulatory support. This is related to the role of policy networks that have not been effective in the development of community-based housing and rural settlement areas in Bandung Regency. The research used a qualitative method, involving informants from various relevant stakeholders. The results of the study show that of the seven primary factors in the policy network, namely Actors, Functions, Structure, Institutionalization, Rules of Conduct, Power Relations, and Actor Strategies, although some tasks and programs have been relatively realized by local governments and non-governmental functional community participation already exists, it is not optimal, regulations and planning are not synchronized, financing is limited, and target results are not yet maximized, so it is not yet fully supportive (effective) in the construction of housing and residential areas in Bandung Regency.

Keywords

Policy Network; Rural Development; Perkim; Community

Full Text:

PDF 247-262

References

Adikara, G. P. F. (2016). Evaluasi Implementasi Peraturan Daerah No. 7 Tahun 2010 tentang Penyerahan Prasarana, Sarana dan Utilitas pada Kawasan Industri, Perdagangan, Perumahan, dan Permukiman di Kota Surabaya. Kebijakan Dan Manajemen Publik, 4(3), 2. http://journal.unair.ac.id/download- fullpapers-kmp140d17af2bfull.pdf

Afala, L. O. M., & Gustomy, R. (2021). Governability, New Development, and Rural Economy at Sanankerto Village, Indonesia. Journal of Governance, 6(1).

https://doi.org/10.31506/jog.v6i1.9 478

Aiyar, S., & Ebeke, C. (2020). Inequality of opportunity, inequality of income and economic growth. World Development, 136, 105115. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2020.105115

Akbar, T. (2018). Kampung Tematik Sebagai Bentuk Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Permasalahan Permukiman Kumuh Di Kota Malang. Wahana, 70(2), 37–48.

https://doi.org/10.36456/wahana.v 70i2.1741

Alam, M. S., Ulwiya, A., & Nurhidayah, M. (2018). Pemanfaatan Alokasi Dana Desa Terhadap Pembangunan Perdesaan ( Studi Kasus Di Tuntang Kecamatan Tuntang Kabupaten Semarang ). Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 18(2), 184–191.

Andari, R. N., & Ella, S. (2019). Developing A Smart Rural Model for Rural Area Development in Indonesia. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 15(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v15i1. 394

Azam, M. (2019). Accounting for growing urban-rural welfare gaps in India. World Development, 122, 410–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2019.06.004

Casey, G. P., & Owen, A. L. (2014). Inequality and Fractionalization. World Development, 56, 32–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2013.10.007

Christiawan, E. S. (2019). Ir-perpustakaan universitas airlangga.

Denhardt, J. V; Denhardt, R. B. (2007). The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering. M. E. Sharpe.

Fitria, N., & Setiawan, R. P. (2014). Identifikasi karakteristik lingkungan permukiman kumuh di Kelurahan Kapuk, Jakarta Barat. Jurnal Teknik Pomits, 3(2), 240–244.

Hidayat, A. dk. (2019). Model Jaringan Kebijakan Publik (Perumusan Kebijakan Masyarakat Adat Ammatoa Kajang Di Kabupaten Bulukumba). Fisip Unhas, 209–218.

Kementerian PPN/Bappenas. (2017). Peta Jalan Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) di Indonesia. Kementerian PPN/Bappenas, 35.

Kuhua, F., Dilapanga, A. R., & Mantiric, J. (2019). Jurnal Administro. Jurnal Administro, 1(1), 05–09.

Kumala Dewi, L., Triono, B., & Suluh Kusuma Dewi, D. (2020). Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam program pembangunan Infrastruktur Perdesaan (PPIP). Jurnal Administrasi Pemerintahan Desa, 1(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.32669/villages.v1 i1.12

Martinez-Vazquez, J., Lago-Peñas, S., & Sacchi, A. (2017). THE IMPACT OF FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION: A SURVEY. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(4), 1095–1129. https://doi.org/10.1111/JOES.12182

Mewangka, B., Hannan, S., & Daud, Y. (2020). Peqguruang: Conference Series. 2(September).

Noveria, M. (2010). Fenomena Urbanisasi Dan Kebijakan Penyediaan Perumahan Dan Permukiman Di Perkotaan Indonesia. Jurnal Masyarakat Indonesia, 36(2), 103–124.

OECD. (2016). A New Rural Development Paradigm for the 21st Century. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264252271-EN

Pigawati, R. N. B. (2015). Kajian Karakteristik Kawasan Pemukiman Kumuh Di Kampung Kota (Studi Kasus: Kampung Gandekan Semarang). Teknik Perencanaan Wilayah Kota, 4(2), 267–281.

Rahman, A., Nurlela, N., & Rifal, R. (2020). Pengarusutamaan Modal Sosial Dalam Pembangunan Perdesaan. Madani Jurnal Politik Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 12(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.52166/madani.v1 2i1.1897

Roebyantho, H., & Unayah, N. (2014). Implementasi Kebijakan Penanggulangan Kemiskinanmelalui Program Rehabilitasi Sosial Rumah Tidak Layak Huni ( RTLH ), Di Kota Garut , Provinsi Jawa Barat. Sosio Konsepsia, 4(1), 311–330.

Robinson, M. (2015). From Old Public Administration to the New Public Service Implications for Public Sector Reform in Developing Countries. UNDP Global Centre for Public Service Excellence, 1–20.

Setyowati, M. A., & Larasati, E. (2019). Implementasi Program Pembangunan Infrastruktur Perdesaan (Ppip) Di Kabupaten Temanggung Tahun 2014. Dialogue : Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 1(1), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.14710/dialogue.v 1i1.5225

Supriatna. (2000). Strategi Pembangunan dan Kemiskinan. Rineka Cipta.

VAN WAARDEN, F. (1992). Dimensions and types of policy networks. European Journal of Political Research, 21(1–2), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1475-6765.1992.TB00287.X

Wattimena, D. L., Damanik, I. P. N., & Kaplale, R. (2018). Analysis of Village Fund Usage for Agricultural Development in Rural Area of Ambon City. Jurnal Agrilan, 6(1), 1–16.

Wijaya, A. F., Andryanto, D., & Wike, W. (2020). Managing Women’s Village Activists Participation in Village Development Planning. Journal of Governance, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.31506/jog.v5i2.8 915

Wijaya, D. W. (2016). Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik (JIAP) prioritas untuk peningkatan kualitas infrastruktur pada kawasan pemukiman kumuh di. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik (JIAP), 2(1), 1–10.

Wijaya, P. Y., Kawiana, I. G. P., Suasih, N. N. R., Hartati, P. S., & Sumadi, N. K. (2020). Swot and micmac analysis to determine the development strategy and sustainability of the bongkasa pertiwi tourism village, Bali Province, Indonesia. Decision Science Letters, 9(3), 439–452. https://doi.org/10.5267/J.DSL.2020.3.002

World Bank. (2003). Rural Development Sector Overview. http://web.worldbank.org/archive/website00831/WEB/OTHER/D0802AA8.HTM

Yin, X., Chen, J., & Li, J. (2022).Rural innovation system: Revitalize the countryside for a sustainable development. Journal of Rural Studies, 93, 471–478.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31506/jog.v8i2.19107