Online Gambling Handling Strategies through a Civil Forfeiture Legal Approach

Yade Setiawan Ujung

doi:10.31506/jog.v10i1.31248

Online Gambling Handling Strategies through a Civil Forfeiture Legal Approach

Yade Setiawan Ujung

Abstract

The rise of online gambling poses significant legal and social challenges, requiring effective countermeasures. This study examines the strategy for addressing online gambling through a civil forfeiture legal approach. Utilizing a normative juridical method, the research analyzes regulations, case studies, and legal frameworks related to asset confiscation from online gambling activities. The findings indicate that civil forfeiture provides a preventive and repressive mechanism to disrupt illegal financial flows and deter perpetrators. However, implementation faces obstacles such as legal inconsistencies and enforcement limitations. The study concludes that strengthening legal instruments, interagency coordination, and public awareness are essential to optimizing civil forfeiture in combating online gambling

Keywords

online gambling; civil forfeiture; legal strategy

Full Text:

PDF 156-172

References

Abdullah, F. , & E. T. (2003). Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi Tanpa Pemidanaan (Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture) Berdasarkan Hukum Indonesia Dan United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC). Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi, 9(1), 19–30.

Aprita, S. , M. H. , H. Y. , R. D. , F. S. , M. A. , . . . & A. F. (2024). Penegakan Hukum terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Perjudian Online di Kelurahan Tanjung Raja Utara Kabupaten Ogan Ilir. . Karunia: Jurnal Hasil Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia, 3(1), 135–139.

Bunga, D. (2019). Kebijakan formulasi judi online dalam hukum Indonesia. Vyavahara Duta, 14(1), 21–34.

Firmansyah, F. (2024). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana mengenai Kejahatan Judi Online (Cyber Gambling) di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum, Politik Dan Ilmu Sosial, 3(4), 310–318.

Fitriyani, D. , & M. M. (2023). Posibilitas penerapan in rem asset forfeiture sebagai upaya asset recovery di Indonesia. AML/CFT Journal, 1(2), 205–219.

Fuadi, G. , P. W. V. , & R. T. (2024). Tinjauan Perampasan Aset dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dari Perspektif Keadilan. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan, 5(1), 53–68.

Hafid, I. (2021). Perampasan Aset Tanpa Pemidanaan Dalam Perspektif Economic Analysis Of Law. Lex Renaissance, 6(3), 465–480.

Haidar, M. B. , & R. E. (2022). Kategori Binary Option Trading Sebagai Perjudian Berbasis Dalam Jaringan (Online). Novum: Jurnal Hukum, 158–167.

Hidayat, A. H. , & A. R. (2024). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Judi Online Ditinjau Dari Ilmu Kriminologi. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 10(11), 23–29.

Hufron, H. , & F. S. (2024). The urgency of regulating forfeiture of assets gained from corruption in Indonesia. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 32(2), 292–310.

Husain, W. R. A. F. (2024). Hukum Pidana Judi Online Perspektif Indonesia Dan Perkembangan Aspek Legalitas. Journal Of Human And Education, 4(6), 1297–1304.

Irawan, A. , H. A. , & U. M. (2023). Perampasan Aset karena Kejahatan, Tak Bertuan dan Telantar Oleh Negara untuk Pembangunan dan Investasi dalam Perwujudan Walfare State. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory, 1(4), 639–655.

Junqueira, G. M. (2020). The assets recovery, the mutual recognition scheme and the requests for judicial cooperation related to non-conviction based forfeiture in Portugal. Rev. Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, 6, 765.

Karim, M. S. (2022). The Concept of Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture As a Legal Policy in Assets Criminal Action of Corruption. Legal Brief, 11(5), 2613–2622.

Kurniawan, Y. , S. T. , & H. S. K. Y. , S. T. , & H. S. (2022). Penegakan Hukum Oleh Polri Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Judi Online (Studi Pada Kepolisian Daerah Sumatera Utara). ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum, 4(1), 28–44.

Lestari, F. K. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Judi Online Yang Menyerupai Tranding Online Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik. Unizar Recht Journal (URJ), 1(3).

Lukito, A. S. (2020). Revealing the unexplained wealth in Indonesian corporation: A revolutionary pattern in non-conviction-based asset forfeiture. Journal of Financial Crime, 27(1), 29–42.

Muntari, A. , & S. I. K. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Judi Online (Undang Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik) di Provinsi Lampung (Studi Putusan Nomor: 871/Pid. Sus/2022/PN. Tjk). Journal of Accounting Law Communication and Technology, 1(2), 192–199.

Nasution, B. (2017). Pengembalian Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi Melalui Civil Forfeiture. Jurnal Integritas, 1–13.

Noerdajasakti, S. , & Y. Y. (2024). Prospects for the Application of Unexplained Wealth Order in the Forfeiture of Assets Proceeds of Corruption in Indonesia. Internationa. Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences, 4(2).

Nurdiansyah, R. , M. M. , & L. M. R. A. (2024). Efektivitas penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana judi online. . Federalisme: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Ilmu Komunikasi, 1(3), 219–238.

Olujobi, O. J. (2021). Recouping proceeds of corruption: is there any need to reverse extant trends by enacting civil forfeiture legal regime in Nigeria?. . Journal of Money Laundering Control, 24(4), 806–833.

Reandi, A. R. D. , & S. F. (2024). Penerapan Sanksi Tindak Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Judi Online Di Indonesia. Jaksa: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik, 2(2), 277–288.

Saputra, R. (2017). Tantangan Penerapan Perampasan Aset Tanpa Tuntutan Pidana (Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture) dalam RUU Perampasan Aset di Indonesia. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 3(1), 115–130.

Sebayang, D. K. , & A. A. (2024). Fenomena Judi Online Dan Pinjaman Online Dalam Perspektif Sosiologi Hukum: Pencucian Uang Melalui Pinjaman Online. Jurnal Retentum, 6(2), 155–165.

Septiana, P. T. , & A. W. (2022). Civil forfeiture Sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Bureaucracy Journal: Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political GovernanceBureaucracy Journal: Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, 2(3), 612–623.

Sherman, N. (2021). Hands Off My Timbs: An Overview of the Methods and Misuses of Civil forfeiture as a Tool of Law Enforcement. Belmont Law Review, 8(2), 11.

Sianipar, F. A. , S. N. , & Y. O. (2024). The Indonesian Arrangement of Asset Forfeiture Draft as Reform Efforts in Recovering State Losses Due to Corruption: A Comparative Study of United States Code. YURIS: Journal of Court and Justice, 29–46.

Suprayitno, W. , K. K. D. , & B. M. Ö. (2023). Asset forfeiture of corruption proceeds using the Non-Conviction based Asset Forfeiture Method: A review of Human Rights. . Indonesia Law Reform Journal, 3(1), 15–25.

Yusni, M. , S. B. , A. E. , & K. B. A. (2023). Policy On Confiscation Of Assets From Corruption Crime Based On Criminal Forfeiture And Civil Forfeiture. International Journal Reglement & Society (IJRS), 4(3), 307–320.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31506/jog.v10i1.31248