Policy Network in Tangerang Live Application
Abstract
Tangerang City as a city that is implementing the Smart City concept to solve city problems and improve city governance. Since 2016 the Tangerang City Government has been running Smart City by creating a Tangerang LIVE Room with the Tangerang LIVE vision of Liveable, Investable, Visitable, and E-City, the vision is based on the use of information, technology and communication to create a public service system and employee work to the community to be more optimal, efficient and effective. Innovations that are being developed by the City of Tangerang have successfully made 174 Applications. The success of the application made 31 City Governments and Agencies in Indonesia adopt applications owned by the City of Tangerang. The principle of the Tangerang Smart City Partnership aims to accelerate regional development at the local level, increase economic growth and community welfare through optimizing the use of regional resources. A qualitative approach was used in this research by collecting data through library research, interviews and documentation of informants who were directly involved in carrying out these activities. The analysis of this study uses Frans Van Waarden's theory model, the results of the study show that: (1) The actors involved have been from all walks of life, but it is better to increase their involvement, (2) The function of each actor should be improved again to achieve the Tangerang policy objectives Live (3) Network structure is already running, but the good Leading Sector is transferred to the Mayor (4) Institutionalization has not been regulated (5) Rules of action have not been regulated in mayor regulations or regional regulations specifically regarding Smart City (6) Power Relations have been running with good (7) The actor's strategy is well underway to manage his dependency.
Keywords
Full Text:
47-60 PDFReferences
Allwinkle, S. and Cruickshank, P. (2011). Creating smart-er cities: An overview. Journal Of Urban Technology, 18(2), 1-16.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2020, 13 Februari). Penduduk Menurut Kelompok Umur dan Jenis Kelamin di Kota Tangerang. Diakses pada (https://tangerangkota.bps.go.id/dynamictable/2015/11/27/21/penduduk-menurut-kelompok-umur dan-jenis-kelamin-di-kota-tangerang-2018.html).
Batty, M. Axhausen, K.W. Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A. Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M. Ouzounis, G. and Portugali, Y. (2012). Smart cities of the future. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214(1), 481-518.
Batty, M. (2013). Big data, smart cities and city planning. Dialogues in Human Geography, 3(3), 274- 279.
Chandra, Eko, W.U. (2016). Strategi Pembangunan Smart Citydan Tantangannya bagi Masyarakat Kota. Jurnal Strategi dan Bisnis Vol.4, No. 2 Universitas Jember.
DeLeon, P. and Varda, M. D. (2009). Toward a Theory of Collaborative Policy Networks: identifying Structural Tendencies. Policy Studies Organizations. Oxford: Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Dutton, W.H., Kraemer, K.L. and Blumler, J.G. (1987). Wired cities: Shaping the future of communications. Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.
Frith, J., (2016). Big data, technical communication, and the Smart City. Journal of Business and Technical Communication.
Greenfield, A. (2010). Everyware: The dawning age of ubiquitous computing. New Riders.
Hancke, G.P. and Hancke Jr, G.P. (2012). The role of advanced sensing in smart cities. Sensors, 13(1), 393-425.
Hashem, I.A.T. Chang, V., Anuar, N.B., Adewole, K., Yaqoob, I. Gani, A., Ahmed, E. and Chiroma, H. (2016). The role of big data in Smart City. International Journal of Information Management, 36(5), 748-758.
Herranz, J. (2006). The Multisectoral Trilemma of Network Management. Journal of Publik Administration Research and Theory.
Hidayat, Rahmat Andi, (2016). Model Jaringan Kebijakan Publik (Perumusan Kebijakan Masyarakat Adat Ammatoa Kajang Di Kabupaten Bulukumba: Universitas Hasanuddin.
Hollands, R.G. (2008). Will the real Smart City please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial?. City, 12(3), 303-320.
Ishida, T. and Isbister, K. eds. (2000). Digital cities: technologies, expe- riences, and future perspectives. Springer Science & Business Media.
Kholisdinuka, Alfi. (2020, 13 Februari). Kota Tangerang Boyong 8 Penghargaan Kehumasan. Diakses pada(https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4688523/kota-tangerang-boyong-8-penghargaan-kehumasan-2019).
Klijn, E. H. and Koppenjan, J.F.M. (2000). “Publik Management and Policy Networks.” Publik Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory 2(2), 135–58.
Komninos, N. (2002). Intelligent cities: innovation, knowledge systems, and digital spaces. Taylor & Francis.
Kurnaedi, Didi. 2017. Penerapan LIVE Smart City Kota Tangerang: STMIK Pringsewu Lampung.
Meijer, Albert. (2017). Datapolis: A Public Governance Perpective on Smart Cities. Perspective on Public Management and Governance. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Public Management Research Association, 9
Moleong, Lexy J. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nabila, Masya. (2020). Survei APJII Pengguna Internet Indonesia Capai 171, 17 Juta Sepanjang 2018. Diakses pada (https://dailysocial.id/post/pengguna-internet-indonesia-2018).
Nazir, M. (2003). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta : Salemba Empat.
Nugroho, Riant. (2011). Public Policy. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
P. deLeon, D M. Varda. (2009). “Toward a Theory of Collaborative Policy Networks: Identifying Structural Tendencies.” The Policy Studies Journal 37(1), 59–74.
Raab, J. and Kenis, P. (2009). Heading Toward a Society of Networks: Empirical Developments and Theoretical Challenges. Journal of Management Inquiry, 18 (3), 198-210.
Rachmawati, R. (2018) Pengembangan Smart Village untuk penguatan Smart City dan Smart Regency. Jurnal Sistem Cerdas 2018 Universitas Gadjah Mada, Vol 1 No.02, 12.
Ramdhani, H. (2018). Reorientasi Politik Gender dalam Sistem Masyarakat Patriarkis. In Seminar Nasional Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang, Vol. 4, No. 03, 621-628.
Ramdhani, H. (2019). Realitas Elit Politik Lokal dan Persepsi Masyarakat dalam Proses Pemekaran Daerah. JPPUMA Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik Universitas Medan Area, 7(2), 219-226.
Rhodes, R. (2005). Policy Network Analysis, in Ferlie, E. et al (ed). The Oxford Handbook of Publik Policy. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Schaffers, H. Komninos, N. Pallot, M. Trousse, B. Nilsson, M. and Oliveira, A.,May (2011). Smart cities and the future internet: Towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation. In The Future Internet Assembly Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 431-446.
Shepard, M. (2011). Sentient city: Ubiquitous computing, archi- tecture, and the future of urban space. The MIT press.
Sutrisno Budi. Akbar. I. (2018) E-Partisipasi dalam pembangunan lokal (Studi Implementasi Smart City di Kota Bandung) Jurnal Sosioteknologi Institut Teknologi Bandung Vol-17. No.2, 194-195.
Syafiie, Inu Kencana. (2010). Ilmu Administrasi Publik. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Thompson, Emine Mine. (2016). What makes a city ‘smart’?. International Journal of Architectural Computing 1-14, 12.
Waarden, F.V. (1992). Dimensions and Types of Policy Networks. European Journal of Political Research Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands 21, 29-5.,
Yusuf, R. M. S. & Jumhur, H. M. (2018). Penerapan E-government Dalam Membangun Smart City Pada Kota Bandung Tahun 2018. eProceedings of Management, 5(3), 3126-3130.
Zanella, A. Bui, N. Castellani, A., Vangelista, L. and Zorzi, M. (2014). Internet of things for Smart Cities. IEEE Internet of Things journal, 1(1), 22-32.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31506/jog.v5i1.7772
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
⟨Recent Issues⟩ | ⟨Upcoming Issues⟩ |
Recent Issues
Volume 6, Issue 2: (2021) | Volume 6, Issue 1: (2021) | Volume 5, Issue 2: (2020) | Volume 5, Issue 1: (2020) | Volume 4, Issue 2 (2019) |