Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA contains publications of research in the field of science learning such as chemistry learning, physics learning, biology learning and natural science learning as a form of intellectual property

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

 
The author sends the manuscript via online, then the editor sends the manuscript to the section editor, then the section editor sends the manuscript to the reviewer according to his expertise and comes from another institution using a double-blind review system, then the reviewer sends the manuscript to the editor, then the editor sends the manuscript to the author with the decision rejected, revised or accepted, then the author sends the revised manuscript to the editor, then the editor publishes the article.

 

Publication Frequency

Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA is published twice a year, May and November

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Article Processing Charges (APCs) & Article Submission Charges

Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA charges the following author fees.

Article Submission: 0.00 (USD)
Article Publishing: 40.00 (USD)
Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA is an open access journal. As an open access journal with no subscription charges, a fee is payable by the author or research funder to cover the costs associated with publication. This ensures your article will be immediately and permanently free to access by everyone. Since manuscript submission November years 2016, Authors should pay some processing fees.
The open access publication fee for this journal is $40.00 per accepted article. This fee is for article processing once their articles has been accepted.

 

Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA is a peer-reviewed e-journal. This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the editor in chief, the editor, the peer-reviewer and the publisher (Department of Science Education Faculty of Teacher Training and Education University of Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa in collaboration with Perkumpulan Pendidik IPA Indonesia (PPII)/ Indonesian Society for Science Educators). This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed of Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.

Department of Science Education Faculty of Teacher Training and Education University of Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa in collaborate with Perkumpulan Pendidik IPA Indonesia (PPII)/ Indonesian Society for Science Educators as publisher of Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the Department of Science Education Faculty of Teacher Training and Education University of Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa in collaborate with Perkumpulan Pendidik IPA Indonesia (PPII)/ Indonesian Society for Science Educators and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication decisions

The editor of the Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

Screening for Plagiarism Policy

Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA have a policy of screening for plagiarism. We use Anti-Plagiarism Software "Turnitin" to check the authenticity article

Turnitin

 

Journal Scientific Statement

The articles published in Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA are scientifically proved following the code of ethics of scientific publication. The code of ethics itself upholds three values of ethics in publications, namely, (1) Neutrality (free from conflicts of interest in public management), (2) Justice (giving the right of authorship to the beneficiary as the author), and (3) Honesty (free from duplication, fabrication, falsification and plagiarism (DF2P) in the publication. The articles published also follow the certain procedures or orders, such as double blind review and revision process that consistent with the journal’s regular review, to ensure that the quality is maintained properly.

 

Retraction

The articles published in Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA will be consider to retract in the publication if:

1. They have clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g. data fabri-cation) or honest error (e.g. miscalculation or experimental error)

2. the findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper crossreferencing, permission or justification (i.e. cases of redundant publication)

3. it constitutes plagiarism

4. it reports unethical research

The mechanism of retraction follow the Retraction Guidelines of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) which can be accessed at https://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines.pdf

 

Request Indexing (Scopus)

  • SCOPUS (Check the latest status)
    • Submission Received : June 26, 2017
    • Validated: June 5, 2018
    • Enrichment in progress: June 5, 2018
    • Enrichment completed: June 5, 2018
    • Ready to be released to CSAB: waiting for update
    • Under review by the CSAB: waiting for update
    • Review complete: waiting for update

 

Request Indexing (Emerging Sources Citation Index)

  • ESCI (Submission Received : June 27, 2018)

 

Request Indexing (Index Copernicus International)

  • ICI (Submission Received : June 27, 2018)

 

Request Indexing (ASEAN Citation Index)

  • ACI (Submission Received : January 25, 2018)