Digital Governance on Broadcasting Industry
Abstract
The development of media based on the internet has not dampened the existence of television broadcasts, because the penetration of information through television is still the highest. In terms of broadcast infrastructure quality, Indonesia lags behind other countries. Indonesia still uses analog channels while other countries have turned off analog broadcasts and switched to digital broadcasts. On top of that, it is necessary to describe the migration policy of analog television broadcasts to digital broadcasts that supports the improvement of television broadcast quality in Indonesia, and the prospects for the post-migration broadcast industry from analog television to digital broadcasting. The result is an analog switch off (ASO) which encourages efficient use of frequency bands in Indonesia. However, it is suspected that the implementation of digital television free-to-air (FTA) migration could damage the broadcast business structure. By 2022, there will be 103 licensed digital broadcasters and 728 broadcasters who will migrate to digital. The number of broadcasts will have an impact on the level of competition between broadcasting institutions to get cake as a source of life. In terms of nice breadth, niche overlap, and nice, all major broadcasts will still dominate the competition map in the broadcast industry. Meanwhile, local broadcasting institutions that are established in the regions will find it difficult to compete.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Arif Wibawa, Subhan Afifi dan Agung Prabowo, Model Bisnis Penyiaran Televisi Digital di Indonesia, Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, Volume 8, Nomor 2, Mei - Agustus 2010, halaman 117 - 130 https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/102593-ID-model-bisnis-penyiaran-televisi-digital.pdf
Baudrillard, J. (1995). Simulacra and Simulation (S. F. Glaser (ed.)). Michigan.
Bauman, Z. (1993). Modernity and Ambivalence. In Contemporary Sociology. Polity Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/2075516
Braet, Olivier, Ballon, Pieter. 2008. Cooperation Models for Mobile Television in Europe, Telematics and Informatics 25 (2008), 216-236.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (fifth). SAGE Publications.
Galperin, Hernan. 2004. New Television, Old Politics; The Transition to Digital TV in the United States and Britain. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011
Giddens, A. (1979). Time, Space, Social Change. In Central Problems in Social Theory. palgrave macmilan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16161-4_7
Rauniar, R., Rawski, G., Yang, J., & Johnson, B. (2013). Technology acceptance model ( TAM ) and social media usage : an empirical study on Facebook. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 27(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-04-2012-00
Sugiyono. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Tadayoni, Reza, Skuby, Knud, Erik, 1999, Terrestrial Digital Broadcasting: Convergence and Its Regulatory Implications, Telecommunications Policy 23 (1999) : 175-199.
Weber, Joseph, Newberry, Tom. 2007. IPTV Crash Course. New York: McGraw Hill
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31506/jog.v7i2.15414
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
⟨Recent Issues⟩ | ⟨Upcoming Issues⟩ |
Recent Issues
Volume 6, Issue 2: (2021) | Volume 6, Issue 1: (2021) | Volume 5, Issue 2: (2020) | Volume 5, Issue 1: (2020) | Volume 4, Issue 2 (2019) |