Towards Bureaucratic Reform to Achieve Good Governance

Agus Fatah Hidayat

doi:10.31506/jog.v7i4.17743

Towards Bureaucratic Reform to Achieve Good Governance

Agus Fatah Hidayat

Abstract

One of the promises of change through bureaucratic reform is the implementation of great services for the benefit of society, but disparities sometimes lead to conflicts in their execution. This took place in Tasikmalaya Regency, where, on the one hand, the bureaucracy is energetically adopting bureaucratic reform as a form of self-improvement, but, on the other hand, a decline in the culture of service and weak employee integrity are obstructing the bureaucracy's growth. The goal of this essay is to determine what factors help and what factors hinder the implementation of bureaucratic reform in the Tasikmalaya Regency Government, as well as what factors contribute to less-than-ideal evaluation results. In this study, we used qualitative research techniques. Observation, notes, and interviews were all parts of the data collection process. Collecting data, reducing data, presenting data, analyzing data, triangulating data, and generating conclusions are all data analysis techniques that can be used to determine the reliability of data and arrive at the truth. According to this paper's findings, the Tasikmalaya Regency government's bureaucratic reform has not moved significantly in a more optimal direction in its quest to accomplish good governance; normative difficulties pertaining to the quality and capacity of apparatus resources persist. When it comes to making significant changes and updates to the governance system, effective governance necessitates increased dedication and a mental shift on the part of leadership and all levels of employees.

Keywords

bureaucratic reform; good governance; local government apparatus.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Arsyad, J. H., & Karisma, D. (2022). Sentralisasi Birokrasi Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah. Sinar Grafika.

Cepiku, D., & Mititelu, C. (2010). Public administration reforms in transition countries: Albania and Romania between the Webberian model and the new public management. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 6(30), 55-78.

Dwiyanto, A. (2021). Reformasi birokrasi publik di Indonesia. UGM PRESS.

Feurer, R., & Chaharbaghi, K. (1995). Strategy development: past, present and future. Management decision.

Gedeona, H. T. (2010). Reformasi Birokrasi Pemerintahan Menuju Good Governance Dalam Perspektif Administrasi Publik. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi, 7(2), 06.

Handrian, E., & Putriani, S. (2021). Reformasi Administrasi Pelayanan Publik di Kantor Camat Minas Kabupaten Siak Provinsi Riau. JIAP (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik), 9(2), 143-154.

Haning, M. T. (2018). Reformasi Birokrasi di Indonesia: Tinjauan Dari Perspektif Administrasi Publik. JAKPP (Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan & Pelayanan Publik), 25-37.

Ida, Y. W., Raga, Y., Wadu, J., & Ratoebandjoe, P. (2020). Identifikasi Patologi Birokrasi Dalam Pelayanan Publik Di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Belu. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 16(1), 15-31.

Kairupan, J. K. (2015). Pengaruh Reformasi Birokrasi Terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Publik Di Dinas Kependudukan Dan Catatan Sipil Kabupaten Minahasa Utara. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 4(35).

Kurniati, P. N., & Nugroho, B. Y. (2019). Urgensi Pelaksanaan Sistem Cashless Government dalam Membangun Birokrasi yang Transparan dan Akuntabel. Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), 9(2), 136-150.

Kurniawan, R. C. (2016). Tantangan kualitas pelayanan publik pada pemerintah daerah. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik Dan Pembangunan, 7(1), 15-26.

Lubis, M. A., Dhevi, R. S., & Yasid, M. (2020). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Aparat Sipil Negara Yang Melakukan Pelanggaran Hukum Dalam Mewujudkan Good Governance. Jurnal Darma Agung, 28(2), 269-285.

Nesia, A., & Arenawati, A. (2013). High Performance Work Dan Peningkatan Kinerja Birokrasi. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 4(2).

Prasojo, E., & Kurniawan, T. (2008, July). Reformasi Birokrasi dan Good Governance: Kasus Best Practices dari Sejumlah Daerah di Indonesia. In The 5 th International Symposium of Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia (pp. 1-15).

Ramli, M. (2013). Manajemen Pelayanan Publik Berbasis Kemanusiaan.

Rohayatin, T. (2017). Strategi Reformasi Birokrasi Pemerintahan Daerah: Menuju Era Globalisasi. Jurnal Transformative, 3(1), 40-52.

Rukajat, A. (2018). Pendekatan penelitian kuantitatif: quantitative research approach. Deepublish.

Sugiharto, G. (2011). Reformasi Birokrasi Menuju Pemerintahan Kelas Dunia Tahun 2025. Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara, 5-22.

Sugiyono, P. (2011). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D. Alpabeta, Bandung.

Suhendra, A. (2018). Inovasi Daerah dalam Reformasi Pemerintahan Kota Tangerang Selatan dan Kota Magelang. Matra Pembaruan: Jurnal Inovasi Kebijakan, 2(1), 39-48.

Utomo, W. (2006). Administrasi publik baru Indonesia: perubahan paradigma dari administrasi negara ke administrasi publik. Pustaka Pelajar.

Wulan, R. R., & Mustam, M. (2017). Peningkatan kualitas pelayanan publik dalam rangka reformasi birokrasi di Kantor Pertanahan Kota Semarang. Journal of Public Policy and Management Review, 6(3), 259-279.

Zuhdi, S., Ferizko, A., & Melinda, P. (2019). Penguatan Kelembagaan Rukun Tetangga dan Rukun Kampung (RT/RW) Di Kelurahan Rintis Kecamatan Lima Puluh Kota Pekanbaru. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 3(1).

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31506/jog.v7i4.17743