POTENSI PELANGGARAN HAK ATAS PROPERTI PRIVAT  DALAM PEMBANGUNAN FASILITAS PUBLIK  (Kasus Pembangunan Bandara Internasional Kulonprogo)

Rahmad Hidayat

doi:10.31506/jog.v2i1.2123

POTENSI PELANGGARAN HAK ATAS PROPERTI PRIVAT DALAM PEMBANGUNAN FASILITAS PUBLIK (Kasus Pembangunan Bandara Internasional Kulonprogo)

Rahmad Hidayat

Abstract

this paper tries to explore deeply about the potential of violation of citizens’ economic, social, and cultural rights by state (government) in the public infrastructure building project. One of EcoSoC rights that potential to be violated is right to private property i.e. individual house and land. Such rights violation is manifested in the form of forced eviction conducted by government to take over the citizens’ asset and land that defined as a site or location for building certain public facilities. The construction of Kulonprogo International Airport in Yogyakarta is positioned as the main object of analysis. To find out the right answer, I use a case study approach while utilizing the case of construction of Lombok International Airport in 2006-2011 as a comparison.

Keywords

right to private property; forced eviction; eminent domain; land acquisition.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Buku:

Benson, L. Bruce (ed.). (2010). Property Rights: Eminent Domain and Regulatory Takings Re-Examined. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Second Edition. Sage Publications. Thousand Oaks.

Harrison, Lisa. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian Politik. Jakarta: Penerbit Kencana.

Nasution, S. (1996). Metode Research.

Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

World Bank. (2004). Involuntary Resettlement Sourcebook: Planning and Implementation in Development Projects. Washington: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the World Bank.

Jurnal:

Fish, Chelsea. (2011). Land Acquisition for Special Economic Zones in India. Thesis. USA: Temple University Graduate Board.

Cabannes, Yves et al. (2007). Finding Solutions to Forced Evictions Worldwide: A Priority to Meet the MDGs and Implement the Habitat Agenda. Geneva, Switzerland: Advisory Group on Forced Evictions (AGFE).

Chaudhry, Shivani. (2014). How to Respond to Forced Eviction: A Handbook for India. India: Housing and Land Rights Network.

COHRE. (2008). Successes and Strategies: Responses to Forced Evictions. Sri Lanka: Wits Associates.

COHRE & ACHR. (2001). Forced

Evictions in Bangladesh: We Didn’t Stand a Chance. Geneva: COHRE & ACHR.

Cummins, Jim. (2009). Pedagogies of Choice: Challenging Coercive Relations of Power in Classrooms and Communities.

International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp.

-271.

Habib, Adam. (2005). State-Civil Society Relations in Post- Apartheid South Africa. Social Research, Vol. 72, No. 3, South Africa: The Second Decade (FALL), pp. 671-692.

Kendra, Jagruti. (1994). Forced Evictions: An Indian Peoples Tribunal Enquiry into the Brutal Demolitions of Pavement and Slum Dwellers Homes by Justice Hosbet Suresh. India: The Committee for the Right to Housing (CRH).

Landford, Malcolm & Jena du Plessis. (2004). Dignity in the Rubble? Forced Evictions and Human Rights Law. Geneva: Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions (COHRE).

Mgbako, Chi et al. (2010). Forced Eviction and Resettlement in Cambodia: Case Studies from Phnom Penh. Washington University Global Studies Law Review, Vol. 9, No. 39, pp. 39-

Munch, P. (1976). An Economic Analysis of Eminent Domain. Journal of Political Economy, Vol 84, No. 3, pp. 473-498.

Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2011). Forced Evictions Assessment Questionnaire. Geneva: OHCHR, United Nations.

Otiso, M., Kefa. (2012). Forced Evictions in Kenyan Cities. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp.

-267.

Romero, Sean. (2007). Mass Forced Evictions and the Human Right to Adequate Housing in Zimbabwe. Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights, Vol. 5, Issue 2, pp. 275-

Younus, Muhammad. (2013). Pakistan: Forced Evictions and Socio- Economic Costs for Vulnerable Communities: An Overview. Karachi, Pakistan: Urban resource Centre.

Dokumen:

Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 tentang Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum.

Internet:

Asian Human Rights Commission. (2006). Indonesia: Excessive Force Used by Police in Central Lombok. Article on Website. Http://www.Ahrchk.net/ua/main file.php/2006/1812. Diakses pada Minggu, 23 Nopember 2014, Jam 21.55 WIB.

Liputan 6 SCTV. (2013). Aksi Demonstrasi dan Pemblokiran Jalan Daendels Kulonprogo oleh Paguyuban Wahana Tri Tunggal. http://www.liputan6.com/2013. sctv.html/. Diakses pada Kamis,

Desember 2014, Jam 21.30 WIB.

Tempo Interaktif. (2009). Belanda Wariskan Sengketa Tanah Sultan dan Pakualam. http://www.tempointeraktif.com

/hg/nusa/2009/05/20/brk. Diakses pada Minggu, 28 Desember 2014, Jam 22.45 WIB.

Wawancara:

Bapak Arie Yuriwin, Kepala Kantor Wilayah (Kanwil) Badan Pertanahan Nasional (BPN) DIY, pada Senin, 29 Desember 2014.

Bapak R. Karmadi, Koordinator KSD Kulonprogo, pada Sabtu, 27 Desember 2014.

Bapak Suradi, Sekretaris Paguyuban WTT, pada Sabtu, 27 Desember 2014.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31506/jog.v2i1.2123