Unveiling the Strategic Model of Political Lies

Firmansyah Firmansyah, Muhammad Sauki, Rahmad Hidayat

Abstract


This article delves into the strategic model of political lies, highlighting the intricate nature of this phenomenon within a political framework. Politicians use various strategies to formulate and disseminate lies, ranging from positive campaigns to negative ones. In positive campaigns, lies create a more favorable public perception of politicians, while in negative campaigns, these undermine opponents' standing, instill doubt, and undermine their credibility. Politicians derive immediate advantages from political lies, such as increased popularity and favorable public perceptions, but must also consider potential future costs, including forfeiting public trust and political ramifications. The strategies employed to deal with political lies vary significantly based on political circumstances. Politicians navigate the delicate balance between short-term political advantage and upholding ethical principles in the political sphere. Political lies can quickly garner support and enhance popularity, but they can also undermine public trust, diminish political credibility, and have enduring consequences for a politician's image. Addressing the issue of political lying requires a multifaceted approach that tackles its root causes while safeguarding democratic principles. Voters are crucial to maintaining accountability by exercising their right to vote and assuming control over the democratic process.


Keywords


democracy; lies; politicians; strategy; veracity.

Full Text:

PDF 201-226

References


Abrams, S. (2016). Beyond Propaganda: Soviet Active Measures in Putin's Russia. Connections: The Quarterly Journal, 15(1), 5–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.11610/Connections.15.1.01

Aragonès, E., Postlewaite, A., & Palfrey, T. (2007). Political Reputations and Campaign Promises. Journal of the European Economic Association, 5(4), 846–884. https://doi.org/10.1162/JEEA.2007.5.4.846

Butler, P., & Collins, N. (1994). Political Marketing: Structure and Process. European Journal of Marketing, 28(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569410049154

Carson, A., & Wright, S. (2022). Fake News and Democracy: Definitions, Impact and Response. Australian Journal of Political Science, 57(3), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2022.2122778

Davis, M. L., & Ferrantino, M. (1996). Towards a Positive Theory of Political Rhetoric: Why Do Politicians Lie? Public Choice, 88(1-2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00130405

DellaVigna, S., & Gentzkow, M. (2010). Persuasion: Empirical Evidence. Annual Review of Economics, 2(1), 643–669. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.economics.102308.124309

Feldstein, S. (2021). The Rise of Digital Repression: How Technology Is Reshaping Power, Politics, and Resistance. Oxford University Press.

Freelon, D., & Wells, C. (2020). Disinformation as Political Communication. Political Communication, 37(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1723755

Fridkin, K., Kenney, P., & Wintersieck, A. (2015). Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire: How Fact-Checking Influences Citizens’ Reactions to Negative Advertising. Political Communication, 32(1), 127–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2014.914613

Gaber, I., & Fisher, G. (2022). “Strategic Lying”: The Case of Brexit and the 2019 U.K. Election. International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(2), 460–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161221994100

Galeotti, A. E. (2018). Political Self-Deception. Cambridge University Press.

Hansson, S., & Kröger, S. (2021). How a Lack of Truthfulness Can Undermine Democratic Representation: The Case of Post-Referendum Brexit Discourses. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 23(4), 609–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148120974009

Hikmawan, M. D., & Hidayat, R. (2016). Depoliticization of Public Issue: Low Degree of Government's Democratic Legitimacy (The Case of the Reclamation Policy of Benoa Bay, Bali, Indonesia). Journal of Governance, 1(1), 27–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.31506/jog.v1i1.1311

Humprecht, E. (2023). The Role of Trust and Attitudes Toward Democracy in the Dissemination of Disinformation—A Comparative Analysis of Six Democracies. Digital Journalism, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2200196

Janezic, K. A., & Gallego, A. (2020). Eliciting Preferences for Truth-Telling in a Survey of Politicians. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(36), 22002–22008. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2008144117

Jenkins, S., & Delbridge, R. (2020). Exploring Organizational Deception: Organizational Contexts, Social Relations and Types of Lying. Organization Theory, 1(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720919436

Kronsted, C., Gallagher, S., Tollefsen, D., & Windsor, L. (2023). An Enactivist Account of the Dynamics of Lying. Adaptive Behavior, 0(0), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/10597123231166421

Kuo, R., & Marwick, A. (2021). Critical Disinformation Studies: History, Power, and Politics. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 2(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-76

Laver, M. (1978). How to be Sophisticated, Lie, Cheat, Bluff, and Win at Politics. Political Studies, 26(4), 462–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1978.tb01311.x

Levine, T. R. (2014). Truth-Default Theory (TDT): A Theory of Human Deception and Deception Detection. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(4), 378–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X14535916

Martin, B. (2014). Tactics of Political Lying: The Iguanas Affair. Journal of Language and Politics, 13(4), 837–856. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.4.11mar

Mattes, K., Popova, V., & Evans, J. R. (2023). Deception Detection in Politics: Can Voters Tell When Politicians Are Lying? Political Behavior, 45(1), 395–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09747-1

Miller, J. A. (2017). All of the People, All of the Time: An Analysis of Public Reaction to the Use of Deception by Political Elites (Doctoral Dissertation, The Ohio State University).

Ozawa, J. V., Woolley, S. C., Straubhaar, J., Riedl, M. J., Joseff, K., & Gursky, J. (2023). How Disinformation on WhatsApp Went from Campaign Weapon to Governmental Propaganda in Brazil. Social Media+ Society, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231160632

Pare, G., Trudel, M. C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015). Synthesizing Information Systems Knowledge: A Typology of Literature Reviews. Information & Management, 52, 183–199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008

Pérez-Escolar, M., Lilleker, D., & Tapia-Frade, A. (2023). A Systematic Literature Review of the Phenomenon of Disinformation and Misinformation. Media and Communication, 11(2), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i2.6453

Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2009). Democratic Capital: The Nexus of Political and Economic Change. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 1(2), 88–126. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/mac.1.2.88

Sharma, N., & Sivakumar, G. (2023). Social Media, Political Discourse and the 2019 Elections in India: Journalists’ Perspectives on the Changing Role of the Mainstream Media in Setting the Political Agenda. Global Media and Communication, 19(2), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/17427665231186252

Thompson, M. R. (2020). Explaining Duterte’s Rise and Rule: “Penal Populist” Leadership or a Structural Crisis of Oligarchic Democracy in the Philippines? Philippine Political Science Journal, 41(1-2), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1163/2165025X-12340022

Woon, J., & Kanthak, K. (2019). Elections, Ability, and Candidate Honesty. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 157, 735–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.11.003




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31506/jog.v9i2.22787

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Recent Issues

⟨Upcoming Issues⟩


Recent Issues

Volume 6, Issue 2: (2021)

 Volume 6, Issue 1: (2021)

 Volume 5, Issue 2: (2020)

Volume 5, Issue 1: (2020)

Volume 4, Issue 2 (2019)

  
                  
                                                                                                                View My Stats
 
Creative Commons License

Journal of Governance is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
  
Copyright © 2019 Journal of Governance. All rights reserved.