Collaborative Governance in the Implementation of E-Government-Based Public Services Inclusion in Jambi Province, Indonesia

Rio Yusri Maulana

doi:10.31506/jog.v5i1.7317

Collaborative Governance in the Implementation of E-Government-Based Public Services Inclusion in Jambi Province, Indonesia

Rio Yusri Maulana

Abstract

The Open Government Indonesia (OGI) action plan, provides a focus on strengthening public services and strengthening public information disclosure, as well as strengthening data governance, it can be facilitated by the presence of government base applications. The success in implementing e-government is the level of policy, fiscal support, and infrastructure. At the community level, although the implementation of e-government has opened up a large space for community participation in using civil rights through a variety of available channels, limited access is a major technical obstacle, supported by a lack of socialization, and application design that is not user-friendly. Initial findings explain that the collaborative process seems less-coordination, open government design has not been connected to the rules for implementing innovations in the regional government, the cause is the absence of commitment from regional heads and stakeholders, the gap between understanding and practical facts is still too wide.

Keywords

collaborative, open government, e-government, public services inclusion, innovative transformation.

Full Text:

91-104 PDF

References

Anderson, et al. (2015). E-Government Strategy, ICT and Innovation for Citizen Engagement. Springer : New York Pg. 14-15

Andhika, L.R. (2017). Perbandingan Konsep Tata Kelola Pemerintah: Sound Governance, Dynamic Governance, dan Open Government, Jurnal Ekonomi & Kebijakan Publik, Vol. 8, No. 2, Desember 2017, hal. 87 – 102

Ansell et al. (2007). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice, JPART 18:543–571

Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Jambi, (2020). Statistik Daerah Provinsi Jambi 2019. CV Salim Media Indonesia : Jambi

Denhardt, R.B.; Denhardt, J.V., (2007) The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering; Armonk, New York/London, England; M.E. Sharpe

Emerson, K., Nabatchi, N., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29.

Gray, B. (2004) Strong Opposition: Frame-based Resistance to Collaboration. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 14: 166–176.

Innes and Booher. (2003) Collaborative policymaking: Governance through dialogue. In Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society, ed. M. A. Hajer and H. Wagenaar, 33–59. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press

Jambindependent.co.id (28 Agustus 2019). Diakses melalui laman https://jambi-independent.co.id/read/2019/08/28/42411/keterbukaan-informasi-publik-jambi-urutan-ke-26-dari-34-provinsi.

Jambi.tribunnews.com. (31 Oktober 2019). Diakses pada laman https://jambi.tribunnews.com/2019/10/31/website-tak-update-nurachmat-sebut-keterbukaan-infomasi-pemprov-jambi-rendah

Lathrop, Daniel dan Ruma, Laurel. (2010). Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice, California: O’Reilly Media.

Linden, R. M. (2010). Leading across boundaries: Creating collaborative agencies in a networked world. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

OECD. (2016). Kajian Open Government Indonesia : Hal-Hal Pokok

Osborne, S. (ed.). (2010). The New Public Governance; London & New York: Routledge

R.S. Morse and Stephens, John B. (2012). Teaching Collaborative Governance: Phases, Competencies, and Case-Based Learning, Journal of Public Affairs Education.

Rosemary et al. (2008), Public Managers in Collaboration in The Collaborative Public Manager; New Ideas for the twenty-firs century, ed Rosemary O’Leary and Lisa Blomgern Bingham, Washinton DC; Georgetown University Press.

Rosemary et al. (2010). The Future of Public Administration around the world, Washinton DC; Georgetown University Press

Stoker, G .(2004). Designing institutions for governance in complex environments: Normative rational choice and cultural institutional theories explored and contrasted. Economic and Social Research Council Fellowship, Paper No. 1.

United Nations. (2006). Innovation in Public Governance: Replicating What Works

Van de Ven, A. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32 , 590–607.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31506/jog.v5i1.7317